US CPI Data Signals Inflation Concerns
The US consumer price index (CPI) for January revealed higher inflation than expected, indicating that the Federal Reserve’s rate cuts in March and May might be delayed. Economists predicted a 2.9% rise in consumer inflation but it actually showed a 3.1% increase. The core figure, which excludes volatile food and energy components, also exceeded expectations with a 0.4% month-over-month increase. This unexpected data has negatively impacted both traditional and crypto markets.
Delay in Fed Rate Cuts Likely
The US CPI data suggests that the anticipated rate cuts by the Federal Reserve may be postponed until July. Previously, investors had predicted rate cuts in March and May. However, with the hotter-than-expected inflation figures, market participants are now betting on a delay. This gives the Fed more reason to maintain current interest rates instead of lowering them in the future.
Interpretation of CPI Data
Economist Stephanie Roth believes that the high CPI data for January could be due to seasonal factors and expects inflation numbers to decelerate from March onwards.
Impact on Crypto Markets
The Federal Reserve’s rate decisions significantly influence asset valuations. Lower interest rates can devalue government securities and increase the attractiveness of cryptocurrencies. The higher-than-expected inflation data suggests potential instability in global financial markets, which could put pressure on crypto markets as well.
Bitcoin Price Decline
Following the announcement of the US CPI statistics, Bitcoin prices dropped by almost 2%. At the time of writing, Bitcoin’s price had fallen to $48,666.29 from $49,536. This decline mirrored the drop in larger markets such as Dow e-minis, S&P 500 e-minis, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis.
Impact of Delayed Rate Cuts
A delay in rate cuts by the Federal Reserve could lead to pressure on global financial markets. If a major collapse occurs, it may have spillover effects on the crypto market, resulting in a gradual decline in prices or reduced transaction volume.
By
By
By
By