CFTC files lawsuit against decentralized autonomous organization

2 min

In a first, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has sued a autonomous organization, including the holders of tokens. 

The CFTC unveiled late Thursday a $250,000 penalty and settlement with bZeroX, LLC and its founders, Kyle Kistner and Tom Bean. The two oversaw the development of the bZx protocol, a protocol for decentralized lending and other activities. The bZx protocol drew headlines in 2020 after suffering code exploits, resulting in the loss of hundreds of thousands of with of

On the other hand, the CFTC’s action today including the filing of a against Ooki DAO, which in 2021 was used to govern the protocol as part of a effort, could have the broader impact. 

The suit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. In its complaint, the CFTC accused Ooki DAO of using its to evade oversight:

“A key bZeroX objective in transferring control of the bZx Protocol (now the Ooki Protocol) to the bZx DAO (now the Ooki DAO) was to attempt to render the bZx DAO, by its decentralized nature, -proof. Put simply, the bZx founders believed they had identified a way to violate the Act and , likewise as other laws, without consequence.”

“The bZx founders were wrong, however,” the agency stressed. “DAOs are not immune from enforcement and may not violate the law with impunity.”

READ  Bitcoin Volatility Expected To Intensify After the FOMC Meeting –

The CFTC identifies Ooki DAO as “an unincorporated comprised of holders of Ooki Tokens,” liable in the suit. 

“The Ooki DAO has never been registered with the commission in any capacity,” the complaint added. The agency goes on to characterize the varying governance decisions made by crypto token holders, including the rebrand from bZx DAO and Ooki DAO. 

“During the DAO Relevant Period, numerous Ooki DAO members have resided in the  United States and have conducted Ooki DAO business (for example, voting Ooki Crypto Tokens to govern the Ooki DAO and operate the Ooki Protocol) from within the United States,” the complaint states.

As reported by a separate settlement order published by the CFTC, Kistner, Bean and bZeroX “unlawfully engaged in activities,” that required registration through existing commodities laws. The commission likewise accused the founders of not following anti-money laws. 

As reported by the order, the 3 neither admitted or rejected the CFTC’s findings.

Commissioner dissents

Notably, one CFTC commissioner, Summer Mersinger, announced a dissent, saying that she disagreed with the agency’s in the matter. 

READ  XRP vs ADA! Cardano & Ripple On The Verge Of A Breakout Soon

Mersinger, a Republican, argued that while the commission could and should act against individuals that allegedly broke the law, the CFTC in this case did not have the legal authority or standing to hold the DAO crypto token holders accountable for violations.

The CFTC should have announced an enforcement action that, “is appropriately based on a person’s culpability rather than status,” as a DAO tokenholder, Mersinger wrote in her dissenting statement, and “is grounded squarely in the authorities granted to the CFTC,” she added, raising an argument that the action relied on thin case law.

She added that if the co-founders and original owners of bZeroX were the only focus of the action, she would have voted yes on the enforcement.

“I cannot agree with the Commission’s approach of determining liability for DAO crypto token holders based on their participation in governance voting,” wrote Mersinger.

The Ooki DAO complaint can be found below:

En Fook i Complaint 092222 by MichaelPatrickMcSweeney on Scribd

READ  Top Ripple Lawyer Warns Crypto Regulatory Hostility Is Hurting the US Severely – Here’s Why

Colin Wilhelm and Aislinn Keely contributed to this report. 

Continue reading on

Disclaimer: This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.

Like it? Share with your friends!

Share via
Share via
Send this to a friend