Coinbase Legal Officer Challenges Government Sanctions Against Tornado Cash

Coinbase Legal Officer Challenges Government Sanctions Against Tornado Cash


Individuals seeking to overturn the decision to sanction Ethereum mixing service Tornado Cash present key arguments for the case, stating the Government is attempting to ban open-source software using a property sanctions statute.

In a new court filing in support of the ongoing legal action against the United States Department of Treasury, individuals seeking to overturn the decision to sanction Ethereum (ETH) mixing service Tornado Cash presented key arguments for the case.

Per the plaintiffs, “this case is not about carving out special regulations for new technology,” but rather holding the Treasury “to the basic requirements of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the Free Speech Clause of the 1st Amendment to the  United States Constitution.”

Taking to Twitter, Coinbase’s chief legal officer Paul Grewal summarized the arguments, stating that “they all come down to the same problem,” that the Government is trying to ban open-source software using a property sanctions statute.

“Because this isn’t what the law was meant to do, [the Government] can’t make the law fit this case,” argues Grewal.

Tornado Cash is a privacy-focused service that allows people to transact anonymously on the Ethereum (ETH) blockchain tech by mixing users’ transactions to make it difficult to identify individual senders or receivers.

READ NOW
Get Ready for the Next Crypto Boom: Meet AiDoge, Terra Classic, and Optimism!

The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) controversially added the mixer to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Individuals (SDC) list in August 2022, thereby sanctioning Ethereum (ETH) wallets associated with the service.

An official statement from United States regulatory authorities alleges Tornado Cash has helped launder greater than $7 Billion dollars since its inception in 2019, citing North Korean attackers and other malicious actors.

A lawsuit against the Treasury, which is backed by Coinbase Crypto exchange and likewise named Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and OFAC Director Andrea Gacki, was filed shortly after, with the sanctions against Tornado Cash contested on four main points.

READ NOW
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink is a SECRET POLYGON CRYPTO WHALE! 🐳

First, the plaintiffs contend that the Treasury defined “Tornado Cash” to include anyone who holds a digital crypto token TORN, despite the fact that “that is not an unincorporated association under the Department’s own test.”

Commenting on this point, Grewal stated that “sanctions depend on assuming that anyone who happens to hold a digital crypto token (TORN) is a member of a legally-recognized entity was known ‘Tornado Cash.’ That’s novel as a legal theory, and it’s wrong as a factual matter.”

The Second argument centers on the Department’s failure to explain how the immutable, open-source smart contracts listed in the designation—which no one can own or control—are sanctionable “property.”

As stated by Grewal, “the legal definition of property is something that can be owned. On the other hand, the open-source, immutable smart contracts at the heart of this privacy software cannot be owned, controlled, or changed by anyone.

READ NOW
Cyberattack targets Apple devices of senior execs & flagged

Consequently, the third challenge is the fact that no one, including the creators, developers, or owners of TORN crypto tokens, has a “property interest” in these smart contracts, reports by Grewal.

“In seeking to find such an interest, the Department relies only on states that the purported Tornado Cash entity has interests in something other than the immutable smart contracts or would tend to profit from increased use of the immutable smart contracts. Neither one is an “interest” in property in the immutable smart contracts, as IEEPA requires,” reads the filing.

1st Amendment Violation

The fourth argument refers to what the plaintiffs say is the violation of the 1st Amendment, which broadly protects the rights of free speech.

“Sanctioning Tornado Cash unconstitutionally burdened speech under the 1st Amendment,” stated Grewal. “Plaintiffs used the software to guard their privacy while engaging in core 1A speech like important donations.”

READ NOW
Get Ready for the Ultimate Crypto Boom with AiDoge Launch!

Reports by Coinbase’s chief legal officer, the Government’s response is “worrisome” as it basically tells people “go speak somewhere else.”

“ On the other hand, the 1A is stronger than that. The Government. can’t simply tell law-abiding Americans to go exercise their freedom in some other venue with far fewer personal protections,” added Grewal.

The legal battle comes as the Dutch court on Wednesday granted Alexey Pertsev, the founder of Tornado Cash, permission to question blockchain tech analytics company Chainalysis in his ongoing money laundering trial.

READ NOW
Bitcoins Bleak Future: Why the Worst is Yet to Come

Reports by Chainalysis’ January report, 34 percent of all funds sent to Tornado Cash came from illicit sources, with the majority of activity concentrated on two forms of cybercrime: cryptocurrency hacks and scams.

Pertsev’s lawyers now want to question the company as a result of the role its data played in the developer’s arrest in August last year.



Source

Read Disclaimer
This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. Lolacoin.org does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.




Follow us

Latest Crypto News

Share via
Share via
Send this to a friend