Hoskinson likened the ideal arrangement for cryptocurrency regulation to the way banking self-regulation works during a june 23 congressional hearing, telling legislators “it’s not the SEC or the CFTC going out there doing KYC-AML, it’s banks.”
“It’s a public-private partnership. What has to be done is to establish those boundaries, then what we can do as innovators is write software to assist make that happen.”
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are two of the financial regulatory authorities battling over jurisdiction of the cryptocurrency industry.
Republican Representative Austin Scott from Georgia posed that neither the SEC nor the CFTC have the manpower to oversee the thousands of digital currencies on the market, saying “it’s not possible to regulate all these currencies.”
Hoskinson replied that the ability of digital currencies to store and transfer data meant they could carry out much of this regulatory work automatically. He likewise used it as justification for allowing the cryptocurrency industry to create self-regulating organizations (SRO) to guide regulatory compliance, like the private banking industry does.
Hoskinson suggested that the industry could create a “self-certification system” that could automatically monitor compliance until an anomaly is encountered, at which point a financial authority would review it.
Further illustrating why manpower should not be a concern for cryptocurrency regulation, Hoskinson hypothesized that even quadrupling the size of the Internal Revenue service (IRS) would not be enough to audit every American.
Rather, Hoskinson reported Representative Scott that digital currencies can be programmed to prevent transaction settlements until legally-mandated checks are performed.
Hoskinson’s June 23 testimonial released via the IOHK website demonstrated he was keen to work with federal regulatory authorities on developing new regulations, stating that compliance with regulation and legislation coming out of the United States “ needs be a guiding value for the blockchain tech industry.”
“ Nonetheless, this is a new technology and a radically new investment class that can not readily fit within the confines of the laws and tests created almost a century ago.”
Hoskinson’s pleas for clearer boundaries in the cryptocurrency regulatory landscape echo the ones made by other industry insiders in the United States last December. sec commissioner Hester Peirce recently partly blamed a lack of regulatory clarity for the SEC constantly rejecting spot Bitcoin (btc) exchange-traded funds (ETF) from launching in the US.
Disclaimer: This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. Lolacoin.org does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.