Pro-XRP Lawyer Challenges SECs View on Hinman Speech as Personal Opinion

Pro-XRP Lawyer Challenges SECs View on Hinman Speech as Personal Opinion


Pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton argues against the SEC’s claims that the controversial Hinman speech documents represent Hinman’s personal opinion, citing the large number of emails and speech drafts and input from top SEC officials.

The founder of CryptoLaw, Pro- XRPย Rippleย (XRP) lawyer John Deaton, has weighed in on the controversial Hinman speech document.ย Deaton has argued against the SECโ€™s assertsย that the emails and speech drafts represented Hinmanโ€™s personal opinion.

In a May 24 tweet, the attorney stated the 63 emails and 52 speech drafts are asย well much to be tagged โ€œpersonal opinions.โ€ย  Reportsย by Deaton, the speech documents contain manyย of input from top SEC officials and cannot be one personโ€™s opinion.

Brief On Controversial Hinman Docs And Deatonโ€™s Argument

The controversial Hinman documents are related to emails and speech drafts from previous SEC Director of Corporate Finance Division William Hinman.ย 

Hinman delivered the speech at the Yahoo Finance All Markets Summit in June 2018, where he reportedly indicatedย that Ether and Bitcoin are not securities.

This document has been a bone of contention between both parties in the XRPย Rippleย (XRP) lawsuit, with Ripple supporting its defense of the Hinman speech.

The speech documents remained sealed after the SEC produced them on October 2022 following 18 months and 6 court orders.

In a recent development, Ripple requested the court to unseal the documents while the SEC fought to keep them sealed, arguing they were irrelevant to the case. Nonetheless, Judge Torres rejected the SECโ€™s motion, saying the documents are subject to public access.ย 

Still, the SEC now argues that the documents represent Hinmanโ€™s personal opinion, whereas Deaton thinks theyโ€™re asย well broad to be a single personโ€™s opinion.ย  Furthermore, the documents likewise contain inputs from SEC officials which the court must consider.

Deaton added, โ€œThere are 63 emails and 52 unique drafts of the Hinman Speech. โ€œFIFTY-TWOโ€ Thatโ€™s manyย of drafts and input for a personal opinion,โ€

READ NOW
Crypto Giant Circle Embraces USDC on Arbitrum for Lightning-Fast Transactions!

The pro- XRPย Rippleย (XRP) lawyer stated this while commenting on a July 2022 tweet regarding the email chain of the Hinman documents.

In 2022, Deaton revealed that the only SEC office whose input is not on the email chain is Ethics Office and Ethics Chief Danae Serrano.

Deatonโ€™s Tweets Spark Debate Between Cryptocurrency Community

John Deatonโ€™s latest tweet stirred reactions between cryptocurrency community members. Between those who commented was previous SEC lawyer Marc Fagel.

Fagel called Deatonโ€™s attention to an existing SEC concept. Reportsย by the lawyer, any statement by an SEC official that isnโ€™t an enforcement action or rulemaking voted on by 5 commissioners at the agency represents the speakerโ€™s personal views. Further, Fagel requested why people have not understood the SECโ€™s stance on the lawsuit.ย 

Responding to Fagelโ€™s comment, the pro- XRPย Rippleย (XRP) lawyer said people understand the concept, but theย issue is the SEC is always transactional in its arguments.ย 

After Judge Torres ordered Hinmanโ€™s document to be unsealed, attorney James K. Filnan said both parties filed a joint letter for a one-week extension until June 13 before opening the speech documents to the public.

Featured image from Pixabay and chart from TradingView

READ NOW
Blockchain Bill Breakthrough: CEO Hails Decentralized Compliance Solution



Source

Read Disclaimer
This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. Lolacoin.org does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.




Follow us

Latest Crypto News

Share via
Share via
Send this to a friend