Understanding Crypto Points: Lack of Transparency and Speculation
Points have become a prominent feature in the crypto world, but their lack of transparency is causing confusion and speculation among users. Unlike tokens, which are recorded on the blockchain, points are off-chain numbers that are given as rewards for certain actions. The problem is that the total supply of points is often not made public, making it difficult for users to know their value or eligibility for potential airdrops. Some projects provide live numbers, but many refuse to disclose this information.
The Importance of Knowing Point Supply
Knowing the total supply of points is crucial for users who want to participate in airdrops or trade points. Without this information, it’s challenging to determine how many points are needed to earn a specific allocation in an airdrop. Additionally, people are now speculating on the value of points, trading them on platforms like Whales Market and Pendle Finance. However, traders are making bets based on limited information, as the points-to-token distribution is often undefined or uncertain.
The Challenge of Estimating Point Numbers
Estimating the number of points is a difficult task due to the lack of transparency. Researchers have had to rely on methods like extrapolation from public leaderboards or estimating based on total value locked in projects. However, these methods only provide rough estimates and highlight the challenge of obtaining accurate point distributions. The distribution of points also varies greatly between projects, further complicating trading decisions.
The Need for Transparency
With 115 billion points issued across 14 projects and increasing trading activity, there is a growing need for transparency in the crypto point ecosystem. Users and traders require more information about point supplies to make informed decisions and avoid speculative trading. Improved transparency would bring clarity and stability to the point market, benefiting all participants.
By
By
By
