Ripple Lawyer Defends Judge Torres Decision

Ripple Lawyer Defends Judge Torres Decision

John Deaton Supports Judge Torres’ Decision in Ripple vs. SEC Case

John Deaton, the legal representative of XRP holders in the Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit, has defended Judge Analisa Torres against critics who claim her recent decision was inconsistent with the 1934 Securities Act. Deaton took to Twitter to explain why Judge Torres’ ruling was correct.

Main Points:

  • Many first-time XRP buyers acquired the cryptocurrency for non-investment purposes, unaware of Ripple’s existence or its ownership of XRP.
  • First-time buyers were attracted to XRP because of its fast transaction speed and low cost compared to Bitcoin and Ethereum.
  • The SEC failed to establish the common enterprise factor required by the Howey test, as XRP holders are not in a common enterprise with each other or Ripple.
  • Deaton argued that the SEC would need more than luck to reverse Judge Torres’ ruling.

Hot Take:

John Deaton firmly supports Judge Analisa Torres’ decision in the Ripple vs. SEC case, emphasizing that the law was applied correctly. He dismisses the criticism and asserts that the SEC would face significant challenges in reversing the ruling.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

Ripple Lawyer Defends Judge Torres Decision