The Battle Between OP Stack and ZK Rollups
Many big crypto companies, including Coinbase and Binance, have chosen to build their layer-2 blockchain solutions on the OP Stack, despite predictions that ZK rollups would be the future of layer-2 blockchains. ZK rollups offer almost instantaneous transaction finalization, while optimistic rollups can take longer. However, the OP Stack is seen as an interim solution for companies that want to start their own layer-2 blockchains now. Eventually, the industry may pivot towards ZK technology. The OP Stack provides flexibility for builders to choose between various attributes, including adopting proofs used with ZK rollup technology. While ZK rollups are more technically complex and computationally intense, they are considered the best solution for scaling Ethereum in the long run.
Key Points:
– Big crypto companies are choosing OP Stack for their layer-2 blockchain solutions, despite predictions favoring ZK rollups.
– OP Stack is seen as an interim solution until ZK technology becomes more accessible.
– The OP Stack allows builders to choose between different attributes, including ZK rollup proofs.
– ZK rollups are more technically complex but are believed to be the best solution for scaling Ethereum.
– ZK-based networks are still in a more immature state of development compared to optimistic rollups.
Hot Take:
While the current trend may be in favor of OP Stack, the long-term future of layer-2 blockchains still seems to point towards ZK rollups. As ZK technology matures and becomes more accessible, it is likely that companies will migrate to this more efficient and secure solution for scaling Ethereum. OP Stack may serve as a stepping stone until then, providing the necessary flexibility for builders to transition to ZK rollups when the time is right.
By
By
By
By
By