The Department of Justice Seeks to Exclude Expert Witnesses in Sam Bankman-Fried’s Trial
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a motion to prevent former crypto exchange founder Sam Bankman-Fried from presenting expert witnesses in his trial for mishandling customer funds. The prosecution questions the legality of the proposed testimonies and argues that they suffer from various deficiencies.
Key Points:
- The United States government argues that Bankman-Fried’s lawyers failed to disclose the witnesses’ opinions and establish their basis, violating court rules.
- The prosecution claims that the proposed opinions of the witnesses are inappropriate for expert testimony, lacking reliable methodology or basis in facts and data.
- According to the motion, the proposed experts would offer legal conclusions that invade the purview of the Court and the jury, or serve no purpose other than providing an expert veneer to inadmissible hearsay testimony about the defendant’s knowledge or intent.
Hot Take:
The DOJ’s motion to exclude expert witnesses in Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial raises concerns about the adequacy of the disclosed opinions and their compliance with court rules. It remains to be seen how the court will decide on the admissibility of these witnesses and their testimonies. This development highlights the complexity and challenges of presenting expert witnesses in crypto-related legal cases.
By
By
By
By
By