A Crypto Executive’s Access to Discovery Material in Question
In a joint letter filed on Tuesday, the extent of Sam Bankman-Fried’s access to discovery material is outlined. Once a prominent figure in the crypto world, Bankman-Fried is now embroiled in a dispute with prosecutors over his access to a laptop. The U.S. Department of Justice revealed that the jailed founder of FTX exchange has access to a laptop and three hard drives containing defense material at all times. This disclosure was made in response to a federal judge’s request for a report on Bankman-Fried’s detention conditions at the Manhattan Detention Center. Bankman-Fried’s defense team argues that his release is necessary for him to adequately prepare for his upcoming criminal trial. They claim that limited internet access and battery life hinder his ability to work on his defense independently.
In compliance with the judge’s order, both parties compiled a report on the matter. The prosecutors’ filing states that Bankman-Fried now has access to an air-gapped laptop for 11 hours each weekday and 7.5 hours on weekends and holidays. Additionally, he has constant access to hard drives containing defense material. Twice a week, he is provided with an internet-enabled laptop. The defense team addressed concerns about battery life and internet connection by providing a new battery with an approximate 8-hour lifespan. Internet speeds ranged from 7.5 to 34 megabits per second throughout the day, which the Department of Justice deems sufficient for most online activities.
Sam Bankman-Fried has been in jail since mid-August following the revocation of his bail due to alleged witness tampering. His defense team has filed an appeal against the bail revocation, asserting that it impinges upon his Sixth Amendment right to work on his own defense. They have requested his temporary release. Prosecutors, however, argue that the technology issues faced by Bankman-Fried are merely inconvenient rather than debilitating.
Hot Take:
The ongoing dispute over Sam Bankman-Fried’s access to a laptop highlights the importance of technological resources in legal proceedings. In the digital age, crypto executives and defendants must rely on efficient technology to prepare their defense adequately. The case demonstrates the influence of technology on the criminal justice system and raises questions about the balance between security concerns and the right to a fair trial in the digital realm.
By
By
By
By
