Disgraced FTX Founder Accused of Attempting to Influence Jury Selection
According to United States Prosecutors, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the disgraced founder of FTX, has allegedly proposed a jury selection process for his upcoming fraud trial that includes lengthy and intrusive questions. The prosecutors argue that SBF’s proposed process contains unnecessary and time-consuming questions that are repetitive, prejudicial, and argumentative.
Objections Raised by US Prosecutors
In a recent court filing, the US government objected to SBF’s proposed voir dire process. They urged the court to adopt their own voir dire process instead, claiming that SBF’s approach is repetitive, biased, and contentious. The prosecutors argue that SBF is seeking questions that are irrelevant to jury selection and that his request for open-ended questions about potential jurors’ opinions on the case goes beyond the purpose of voir dire.
Tension Mounts as Trial Approaches
The tension surrounding SBF’s upcoming trial continues to rise. Despite ongoing efforts by SBF and his legal team to secure temporary release from prison for better trial preparation, their request was denied by Judge Kaplan on September 13. Additionally, the judge informed them that SBF does not have the right to access every piece of evidence against him.
SBF’s lawyers have argued that the last-minute addition of millions of pages of evidence by US prosecutors is unjust and hinders his ability to receive a fair trial.
Hot Take: US Prosecutors Accuse SBF of Manipulating Jury Selection Process
The US prosecutors have accused Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) of attempting to influence the jury selection process for his fraud trial. They argue that SBF’s proposed questions are unnecessary, time-consuming, and biased. The prosecutors have urged the court to adopt their own voir dire process instead. As tension mounts in anticipation of the trial, SBF’s request for temporary release from prison was denied, and his access to evidence has been restricted. This latest development adds to the ongoing dispute between SBF and US prosecutors, with SBF’s legal team claiming that the late addition of evidence is unfair. The outcome of the trial remains uncertain as both sides continue to clash.
By
By
By
By