• Home
  • Firms
  • FTX Law Firm Refutes Involvement in Collapse; Counters Claims as ‘Fatally Deficient’ in Court Filing
FTX Law Firm Refutes Involvement in Collapse; Counters Claims as 'Fatally Deficient' in Court Filing

FTX Law Firm Refutes Involvement in Collapse; Counters Claims as ‘Fatally Deficient’ in Court Filing

Law Firm Disputes Claims Made Against FTX Founder

Fenwick & West, a law firm representing FTX, has filed a motion to dismiss the allegations made against them in a Florida federal court. The firm argues that the complaint fails to provide sufficient evidence for claims of conspiracy, aiding and abetting fraud, negligence, or racketeering. Fenwick & West maintains that their legal services were provided within the scope of representation and they did not act outside their role as legal counsel. They also argue that there is no plausible evidence to suggest that they had knowledge of the alleged fraud committed by FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried and other insiders.

Insufficient Allegations and Lack of Knowledge

Fenwick & West further asserts that the complaint lacks specific details regarding the alleged misconduct and does not meet the requirements for fraud-based cases. They claim that the complaint fails to demonstrate how they substantially assisted the fraud or caused any damages. The law firm also disputes the claim made under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), stating that there is no evidence of their participation in a criminal enterprise. They argue that FTX and its employees acting within their roles do not constitute a RICO claim.

Bankman-Fried’s Legal Advice Defense

In response to these allegations, Bankman-Fried’s attorneys have filed a separate document stating that he had received legal advice assuring him that his actions were lawful. They argue that Bankman-Fried believed FTX’s policies had been reviewed and approved by lawyers, refuting any claims of intentional fraud.

Hot Take: Law Firm Counters Allegations Made Against Them

Fenwick & West strongly denies the claims made against them in relation to their representation of FTX. They argue that the allegations lack sufficient evidence and fail to establish their involvement in any fraudulent activities. The law firm asserts that they provided routine legal services within their role as legal counsel and were not aware of any misconduct. Additionally, Fenwick & West disputes the claim made under RICO, stating that FTX and its employees do not constitute a criminal enterprise. The case continues as the court evaluates the validity of these arguments.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

FTX Law Firm Refutes Involvement in Collapse; Counters Claims as 'Fatally Deficient' in Court Filing