Steven Nerayoff Reveals Email Transcripts in ETH Gate Saga
Steven Nerayoff, a participant in Ethereum’s Initial Coin Offering (ICO), has made further revelations in the ongoing ETH Gate controversy. The controversy centers around whether or not the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) gave Ethereum special treatment. After being pressured by a member of the XRP community, Nerayoff released transcripts from an email that Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin sent to him in 2014. The email mentioned an “opinion letter” that would be forwarded to Lubin. A video clip featuring pro-XRP legal expert John Deaton suggests that this opinion letter may be significant.
The Significance of Lubin’s Piece of Paper
Attorney Bill Morgan speculates that the opinion letter mentioned in Lubin’s email was written by Jeffrey Alberts and Fry Bertrand, who co-authored a piece titled “Is Bitcoin A Security?” in 2015. This suggests that Alberts and Bertrand may have written the letter to convince the SEC that Ethereum was not a security before the ICO. Another theory highlights Alberts’ role in structuring the initial public sale of ether and his connection to Marc Berger, who charged Ripple and is now working with Bill Hinman at the SEC.
Hot Take: The Implications of Nerayoff’s Revelations
The recent revelations by Steven Nerayoff regarding email transcripts and an opinion letter raise questions about whether Ethereum received favorable treatment from the SEC. If it is true that lawyers Alberts and Bertrand wrote the opinion letter, it suggests a deliberate effort to persuade the SEC that Ethereum was not a security before its ICO. Additionally, the connections between Alberts, Berger, and Hinman raise concerns about potential conflicts of interest within the regulatory body. These revelations add fuel to the ongoing debate surrounding the regulatory status of Ethereum and its ICO, further complicating the ETH Gate saga.
By
By
By
By
By