• Home
  • Binance
  • Stablecoins: Circle Asserts Non-Security Status, Counters SEC Authority on Dollar-Pegged Cryptocurrencies
Stablecoins: Circle Asserts Non-Security Status, Counters SEC Authority on Dollar-Pegged Cryptocurrencies

Stablecoins: Circle Asserts Non-Security Status, Counters SEC Authority on Dollar-Pegged Cryptocurrencies

Circle Challenges SEC’s Assertion on Crypto Assets

Circle, the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, has submitted an amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) case against Binance, disputing the SEC’s claim that most crypto assets are securities.

In its brief, Circle argues that stablecoins, which are crypto assets pegged 1:1 to the US dollar and used for payments and settlements, should not fall under the SEC’s regulatory purview. The company emphasizes that these assets lack the essential features of an investment contract and do not offer potential profits based on the issuer’s efforts.

Circle contends that sales of payment stablecoins should be considered asset sales and not investment contracts, as established by decades of case law. However, while advocating for stablecoins to be outside of the SEC’s jurisdiction, Circle also acknowledges the need for a robust regulatory framework to protect consumers and US financial stability.

Circle Aims to Educate on Stablecoin Nature

The purpose of Circle’s brief is to provide clarity on the nature of stablecoins. The SEC alleges that Binance engaged in the illegal offering and sale of an unregistered security by not registering its Binance USD (BUSD) stablecoin with the securities watchdog.

Circle clarifies that its submission does not support either party but seeks to assist the court in understanding stablecoins’ status under federal securities laws. The company believes that addressing these legal questions is crucial for digital currency and the broader US economy.

A Call for a Sound Regulatory Regime

While Circle argues that payment stablecoins should be exempt from SEC regulation, it emphasizes the importance of a sound regulatory regime to protect consumers and maintain US financial stability when it comes to dollar-pegged crypto assets.

Hot Take: Circle Asserts Stablecoins Are Not Securities

Circle challenges the SEC’s assertion that stablecoins are securities, arguing that they lack the essential features of an investment contract and do not offer potential profits based on the issuer’s efforts. The company believes that stablecoins should be outside the SEC’s jurisdiction, but it also calls for a strong regulatory framework to ensure consumer protection and financial stability. Circle submitted its brief in the SEC’s case against Binance to shed light on the nature of stablecoins and address legal questions surrounding their status under federal securities laws.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

Stablecoins: Circle Asserts Non-Security Status, Counters SEC Authority on Dollar-Pegged Cryptocurrencies