Rostin Behnam Calls for Comprehensive Crypto Regulations
At the Futures Industry Association Expo, Rostin Behnam, Chair of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), reiterated his call for a comprehensive regulatory structure for the crypto sector. This comes as regulatory scrutiny of the digital asset market continues to increase. Behnam’s stance diverges from that of Gary Gensler, Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), who believes that existing securities laws are sufficient for the crypto industry.
A Divide in Regulatory Philosophy
Behnam emphasized the CFTC’s enforcement work, noting that they obtained over $6 billion in financial relief through 45 enforcement actions related to misconduct in the digital asset market. He argued that around 70% of the crypto industry should be categorized as commodities, contradicting Gensler’s belief that existing securities laws are suitable for regulating the crypto market. To enforce this categorization, Behnam called on Congress to create explicit rules empowering the CFTC to regulate commodity tokens.
Cybersecurity and Legal Victories
Behnam highlighted the importance of proactive measures in cybersecurity and customer safety, stressing that a reactive approach would compromise the Commission’s objectives. He also mentioned a significant legal victory against Ooki DAO, which was shut down and fined $643,542. The ruling classified Ooki DAO as a ‘person’ under the 1936 Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). Behnam discussed the limitations imposed by the outdated CEA and acknowledged the changing landscape of financial markets, raising new regulatory concerns.
Hot Take: A Divergence with Lasting Implications
The contrasting views on crypto regulation between the CFTC and SEC chairs highlight a divide that could have long-term consequences for the industry. As both agencies compete for jurisdiction over the evolving market, achieving a unified regulatory approach seems unlikely. Behnam’s call for tailored regulations specific to the crypto and DeFi sectors underscores the need for comprehensive oversight. However, Gensler’s belief in the adequacy of existing securities laws suggests a different approach. The outcome of this regulatory divergence will shape the future of the crypto industry.
By
By
By
