SEC Opposes Coinbase’s Motion to Dismiss
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a motion to oppose Coinbase’s motion to dismiss the case against them. This move was expected, and Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, called it “more of the same old same old.”
In June, the SEC sued Coinbase for allegedly selling unregistered securities and providing an unregistered staking service. However, Grewal argues that the agency has no basis for these claims since Congress has not legally classified crypto assets as securities.
Coinbase had previously filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, claiming that the SEC violated due process and abused its discretion. The SEC’s response repeated their argument that crypto assets are securities. Grewal stated that the assets listed on Coinbase’s platform are not securities and fall outside the SEC’s jurisdiction.
Crypto lawyer John E. Deaton believes that after reading the SEC’s opposition, Coinbase’s chances of winning have improved to at least 50%.
Ignoring the Crypto Community
Grewal criticized the SEC for its aggressive regulation of the crypto industry, which ignores the 52-million strong crypto constituency in the US that desires clear rules and regulations for this innovative technology. He also expressed concern that this approach could harm investors in the sector.
Coinbase will respond to the SEC’s opposition on October 24.
Hot Take: SEC Continues Its Battle Against Coinbase
The SEC’s opposition to Coinbase’s motion to dismiss indicates that the regulatory agency is determined to pursue its case against the cryptocurrency exchange. Coinbase argues that crypto assets are not securities and therefore fall outside the SEC’s jurisdiction. However, the SEC maintains that these assets should be treated as securities, similar to company stocks.
This legal battle highlights the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. It also raises questions about how Congress will ultimately define and regulate these digital assets. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the entire crypto industry and its relationship with regulatory authorities.
By
By
By