A Bewildering Statement by the SEC
Bill Morgan, a well-known attorney and crypto enthusiast, recently expressed his confusion and frustration on social media regarding a statement made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in a legal brief concerning a crypto case involving Coinbase. The specific passage in the SEC’s document that caught Morgan’s attention raised questions about the distinction between crypto assets and digital tokens.
The SEC’s statement suggested that while crypto assets may have inherent value, it is the digital token that grants access to that value. Additionally, the document stated that these digital tokens would have no worth without the associated services or intellectual property represented by the crypto assets.
Morgan’s Interpretation of the Statement
Bill Morgan found the SEC’s statement to be unclear and lacking legal reasoning. He was particularly puzzled by the idea that if digital assets have any intrinsic value, it is the digital asset itself that reveals this value. Morgan viewed this representation as redundant and confusing.
Morgan also questioned the assertion that a digital token’s worth is solely tied to its investment contract. To him, it seemed like a roundabout way of suggesting that the value of a token comes from collective contributions in a shared venture.
Furthermore, Morgan highlighted the ambiguity of the statement that tokens have no value without connection to a service or intellectual rights. He believed this notion was inconsistent when analyzing an investment contract. Overall, he concluded that this passage from the SEC was one of their most perplexing explanations regarding the essence and valuation of cryptocurrency.
An Expert’s Perspective
Anders, a recognized digital asset researcher, responded to Morgan’s post with a suggestion about the SEC’s possible motive. He wondered if this statement was an attempt to counter Torres’ ruling in the Ripple case, which stated that XRP itself is not a security.
Bill responded by suggesting that the SEC is desperately trying to establish a conceptual framework to convince courts that any crypto sale should be considered an investment contract. He warned that if the SEC succeeds, only XRP and Bitcoin would be recognized as not being securities, leaving other cryptocurrencies in uncertain territory.
Hot Take: SEC’s Confusing Explanation of Cryptocurrency
The recent statement by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in a legal brief related to a crypto case involving Coinbase has left many perplexed. Bill Morgan, a renowned attorney and crypto enthusiast, expressed his confusion over the SEC’s distinction between crypto assets and digital tokens. According to Morgan, the SEC’s explanation lacks clarity and legal rationale.
Morgan specifically questioned the idea that if digital assets have any value, it is the asset itself that reveals this worth. He also found the assertion that a digital token’s worth is solely tied to its investment contract to be ambiguous. Furthermore, he highlighted the inconsistency of the statement regarding tokens being devoid of value without connection to a service or intellectual rights.
This puzzling explanation from the SEC has sparked speculation among experts about their motives and potential implications for cryptocurrencies like XRP. If the SEC succeeds in establishing a framework where all crypto sales are considered investment contracts, it could have far-reaching consequences for the industry.
By
By
By