Week 2 of Sam Bankman-Fried’s Trial: Alleged Fraudulent Schemes and Testimonies
The second week of Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial in New York continued with testimonies from key witnesses and allegations of fraudulent schemes orchestrated by the FTX founder himself. Former Alameda and FTX CTO, Gary Wang, testified that special code was written to allow SBF’s hedge fund to withdraw without limits. He also claimed that SBF lied about how FTX treated customer cash and assets. Another witness, Adam Yedidia, revealed that Bankman-Fried admitted that the crypto exchange was not “bulletproof” after a significant financial hole was discovered in Alameda’s accounts. The defense argued that Alameda’s access at FTX was due to market responsibilities and denied any intention to defraud users. They also highlighted the role of big margin loans issued by FTX to Alameda.
Defense Lawyers Focus on Alameda Loans
During the trial, SBF’s defense attorney questioned Gary Wang about legal advice he received regarding loans from Alameda Research. The defense team emphasized that FTX had multiple lawyers from different law firms. The cross-examination continued on day 5 of the trial after a request from SBF’s lawyers.
Hot Take: Examining Allegations of Fraud in Sam Bankman-Fried’s Trial
The ongoing trial of Sam Bankman-Fried has brought forth allegations of fraudulent schemes and misleading practices within FTX. Testimonies from former colleagues have raised concerns about the treatment of customer funds and the financial stability of Alameda Research. While the defense argues that these issues were a result of poor hedging strategies and market volatility, the prosecution maintains that Bankman-Fried played a central role in fraudulent activities. As the trial progresses, it remains to be seen how the jury will interpret the evidence presented and determine the extent of Bankman-Fried’s involvement. The outcome of this trial could have significant implications for the reputation and future of FTX and its founder.
By
By
By
By
