XRP’s Unique Status Following Court’s Ruling
Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, has highlighted the impact of the court’s ruling in favor of Ripple against the SEC. In an interview with CNBC, Alderoty stated that XRP now has much-needed clarity in the US and is uniquely classified as a non-security.
The ruling on July 13 by Judge Torres confirmed that XRP is not a security and that Ripple’s sales and distributions of XRP do not constitute investment contracts. This decision has provided clarity for Ripple and opened opportunities for the company to expand its business globally.
However, Alderoty believes that it should not be necessary for every crypto company and token to go through legal battles with the SEC to gain regulatory clarity. He emphasized the need for a rational regulatory framework.
Reason For Lack Of Regulatory Clarity
Alderoty pointed out that the lack of regulatory clarity in the US crypto industry is due to politics and power taking precedence over sound policy. He criticized agencies for fighting over regulatory control instead of focusing on the right regulatory approach, such as licensing.
He cited other countries like Singapore, the United Kingdom, Dubai, Brazil, Australia, and Japan as examples where regulators encourage compliance with their rigorous regulatory regimes. For instance, Singapore’s Monetary Authority requires Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) to obtain a license before operating.
Ripple’s subsidiary in Singapore recently obtained a Major Payments Institution (MPI) license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore. This license enables Ripple to provide regulated digital payment token services in Singapore.
It is expected that Ripple will now seek adoption of its technology for cross-border transactions by US financial firms following Judge Torres’ ruling.
Hot Take: Ripple’s Court Victory Sets Stage for Regulatory Clarity
Judge Analisa Torres’ ruling in favor of Ripple against the SEC has had significant implications for XRP and the crypto industry. The court’s decision grants XRP a unique status as a non-security in the US, providing much-needed clarity. However, this victory does not eliminate the need for a rational regulatory framework.
The lack of regulatory clarity in the US crypto industry is attributed to political and power struggles among agencies. In contrast, other countries like Singapore have established rigorous regulatory regimes that encourage compliance and innovation.
Ripple’s subsidiary in Singapore obtaining a Major Payments Institution license demonstrates the success the company can achieve in countries with clear regulatory frameworks. Ripple now has an opportunity to engage with US financial firms for cross-border transactions following the court ruling.
By
By
By
By
By