AI and Job Threat: Signal’s President Meredith Whitaker Warns of Negative Impact
According to Meredith Whitaker, president of Signal, artificial intelligence (AI) does not directly replace jobs but can be used as a pretext to degrade working conditions. Speaking at Web Summit 2023 in Lisbon, Whitaker, who co-founded the AI Now Institute, highlighted the social implications of AI and emphasized that claims of AI replacing workers are not entirely accurate.
Whitaker pointed to the recent Hollywood writer’s strike and the introduction of generative AI into the creative process as examples where AI doesn’t replace workers but rather requires a significant number of laborers to develop and maintain the systems. However, she cautioned that AI provides a pretext for bosses to degrade working conditions.
Whitaker specifically mentioned ride-sharing app Uber as engaging in “labor law arbitrage” and degrading employment status globally under the pretext of AI. She placed responsibility on studio executives in Hollywood and big tech firms like Microsoft, Google, and Meta for making AI tools available to businesses with the aim of increasing profits at the expense of workers.
Signal’s Stance on AI
Signal has no intention of integrating artificial intelligence due to its commitment to privacy. Whitaker emphasized that Signal minimizes user data and does not have access to personal information or conversation contents. She expressed distrust in AI as a tool developed by large corporations and used by employers, police services, and governments.
Hot Take: The Impact of AI on Working Conditions
Meredith Whitaker’s insights shed light on the potential negative impact of AI on working conditions. While AI may not directly replace jobs, it serves as a pretext for employers to degrade working conditions and employment status. Signal’s decision not to integrate AI reflects a commitment to privacy amid growing concerns about the use of AI by large corporations and institutions.
By
By
By
By
By