In a recent Twitter discussion, Molly Elmore from Valhil Advisors emphasized the impact of legal challenges on XRP’s potential value. This revelation emerged from the XRP Fair Market Valuation Report, offering insight into the hypothetical scenario for XRP without legal hurdles.
### The Ripple Effect of SEC Litigation
The valuation discussion traces back to December 2020 when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, alleging that XRP was a security, not a currency. This lawsuit led to a significant market sell-off, raising questions about XRP’s fair market valuation.
Elmore’s tweets based on the Valuation Report highlighted the crucial difference between market value and fair market value, significant in the context of the lawsuit. Market value reflected the immediate price post-litigation, while fair market value aimed to encompass intrinsic worth based on its utility, adoption, and potential.
### The Global Perspective
Elmore’s tweets also revealed a global interest in XRP. Despite aiming at an American audience, the report garnered international viewership with readers from 180 out of 195 countries showing interest.
### The Ripple of Lost Opportunities
Elmore’s thread acknowledged the years of innovation lost on the XRP Ledger (XRPL) due to the lawsuit, emphasizing the need for a clearer regulatory framework to prevent such losses in the future.
Hot Take: The Struggle for XRP’s Value in the Shadow of Legal Battles
The legal battles surrounding XRP have undoubtedly impacted its value, as evidenced by the significant market sell-off and potential lost opportunities for innovation. The global interest in XRP also underlines its widespread significance, pointing towards the need for a clearer regulatory framework for digital assets to thrive and realize their potential.
By
By
By
By
