Australia’s Tax Regulator Provides Unclear Guidance on DeFi Transactions
Australia’s tax regulator, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO), has released new guidance that has left many confused about whether capital gains tax (CGT) is applicable to various decentralized finance (DeFi) transactions. According to the ATO, CGT may be payable when transferring tokens to another address or smart contract that a person doesn’t have “beneficial ownership” over, or if the address has a non-zero token balance. Examples of DeFi uses that may incur CGT events include exchanging one crypto asset for an equivalent number of the same asset in the future, providing liquidity to a protocol, wrapping tokens, and loaning assets.
However, the ATO’s guidance lacks clarity on whether the rules encompass liquid staking and sending tokens through a layer 2 bridge. The tax consequences of a transaction will depend on the specific steps taken and the circumstances of the taxpayer who owns the cryptocurrency assets. This lack of clarity leaves investors uncertain about how to comply with these new rules.
Potential Impact on DeFi Users in Australia
If a CGT event is triggered by these transactions, it could mean that individuals would need to pay taxes on their “profit,” even if they haven’t sold their assets or realized any actual profit. This could create complexity and uncertainty for Australian crypto users. Senator Bragg criticized the Labor government for not releasing these findings and allowing the ATO to make its own rules without legislation.
Experts Question ATO’s Understanding of DeFi
Some experts have expressed concerns about the ATO’s understanding of DeFi and its aggressive approach to taxation. They argue that the ATO doesn’t fully comprehend the nature of these transactions, especially when it comes to liquid staking services. Matt Walrath, the founder of Crypto Tax Made Easy, believes that the ATO’s rules are too strict and make it harder for Australian DeFi users to stake and transfer funds to layer 2 blockchains.
Walrath argues that beneficial ownership is not transferred when users interact with liquid staking services, and therefore no CGT event should occur. He compares it to mortgaging a house where the bank may own it, but the individual is still the beneficial owner who can derive income from it. Additionally, he questions whether wrapped tokens should be subject to CGT since they are economically similar to their original assets.
Hot Take: Australia’s Tax Regulator Needs to Clarify DeFi Taxation
The Australian Taxation Office’s recent guidance on capital gains tax for decentralized finance transactions has raised concerns and confusion among crypto users in Australia. The lack of clarity regarding the taxation of liquid staking, layer 2 bridges, and wrapped tokens has left investors unsure about how to comply with these rules. Experts argue that the ATO needs a better understanding of DeFi and its economic implications before imposing aggressive tax regulations. It is crucial for the ATO to provide clearer guidance that takes into account the unique characteristics of DeFi transactions and ensures fair and reasonable taxation for Australian crypto users.
By
By
By
By
By