Paradigm Voices Criticism of Blast’s Marketing Strategy
Crypto venture capital firm Paradigm has expressed its disapproval of Blast’s protocol marketing strategy, stating that it went too far in terms of messaging and execution. The firm specifically criticized Blast’s decision to launch a bridge before allowing withdrawals, effectively locking user funds for months.
Paradigm Disagrees with Blast’s Approach
Paradigm, one of Blast’s seed investors, publicly disagreed with the protocol’s decision. Dan Robinson, the head of research at Paradigm, stated that launching the bridge before the Layer-2 network and not allowing withdrawals for three months sets a bad precedent for other projects. Despite the criticism, Robinson acknowledged that Blast has a talented team capable of building great products.
Polygon Raises Concerns About Blast
In addition to Paradigm, Polygon has also been critical of Blast and its recent launch. Jarrod Watts, a developer relations engineer at Polygon, highlighted Blast’s centralization as a significant security risk. Watts also pointed out that Blast is only a 3/5 multisig, making it vulnerable to theft if three out of the five keys are compromised.
Blast TVL Continues to Grow
Despite the controversy surrounding its launch, Blast has managed to accumulate $555 million in total value locked (TVL) within days. The protocol claims to be the only Ethereum Layer-2 network with native yield for ETH and stablecoins. However, this has sparked a debate about whether the DeFi ecosystem needs more Layer-2 networks, considering the existing options available.
Hot Take: Blast Faces Criticism Over Marketing Strategy and Security Concerns
Blast’s marketing strategy and security measures have come under fire from both Paradigm and Polygon. Paradigm criticized Blast’s decision to prioritize the launch of a bridge over enabling withdrawals, while Polygon raised concerns about Blast’s centralization and vulnerability to theft. Despite these criticisms, Blast has managed to attract a significant amount of value locked within a short period. However, this success has also ignited a debate about the necessity of additional Layer-2 networks in the DeFi ecosystem.
By
By
By
By
By
By