Tether Minting 1 Billion USDT, Boosting Crypto Markets
Tether, the issuer of the USDT stablecoin, has recently minted 1 billion USDT tokens, adding approximately $1 billion to its Treasury. This increase in the circulating supply of Tether is often followed by a rise in the price of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, as stablecoins are commonly used for trading. Many addresses that have deposited funds with Tether’s Treasury are now sending their USDT to centralized exchanges, likely intending to exchange them for BTC or altcoins.
Tether’s Market Capitalization Surpasses $94 Billion
Tether’s market capitalization continues to grow rapidly. In addition to the recent minting of 1 billion USDT, the stablecoin has added around $2.25 billion in market capitalization over the past week and over $4 billion in the last month. Compared to competitors like USDC, DAI, and TUSD, Tether is increasing its presence in cryptocurrency markets and boosting liquidity for exchanges. The overall market capitalization of stablecoins has been rising consistently for 15 consecutive weeks.
Whales Preparing for Bull Run by Sending USDT to Exchanges
Whales in the crypto market are preparing for a potential bull run by accumulating stablecoins. There have been reports of suspicious flows of USDT to major exchanges recently. When stablecoins are sent to exchanges, it usually indicates an intention to purchase volatile assets like BTC or ETH. Conversely, when BTC or ETH is transferred from private wallets to exchanges, it suggests a desire to sell these assets on a more liquid market. Notably, an anonymous address has accumulated over $2.8 billion in three months and started transferring funds to exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken.
Hot Take: Potential Insider Trading?
There have been intriguing coincidences between significant events in the crypto market and large transfers of USDT. For example, an unknown user sent 160 million USDT to centralized platforms just hours before fake news about the approval of a Bitcoin spot ETF by the SEC. While there is no concrete evidence of insider trading, these incidents raise suspicions. It’s worth considering the possibility that someone had foreknowledge of certain market events, although further investigation is necessary to determine if any wrongdoing occurred.
By
By
By
By