The Truth Behind the Ethereum “Ultrasound Money” Narrative
There has been a lot of talk in the Ethereum community about the concept of “ultrasound money,” which suggests that Ethereum has better tokenomics and the potential to become a deflationary asset compared to Bitcoin. However, not everyone agrees with this narrative.
A developer named antiprosynthesis.eth challenged the “ultrasound money” narrative, arguing that it is often accompanied by confusing jargon that may mislead ordinary users. The developer believes that Ethereum’s monetary policy is designed to strike a balance between inflation and deflation, ensuring sustainability without extreme fluctuations.
To achieve this balance, Ethereum burns a portion of gas fees through its bidding system. With the implementation of EIP-1559, the network sets a base fee that is burned, making the network deflationary and sustainable.
Ethereum vs. Bitcoin: Different Approaches to Sustainability
In contrast, Bitcoin continues to issue new coins to miners until all 21 million BTC are distributed. However, the issuance rate decreases over time through halving mining rewards. While Ethereum’s approach focuses on burning fees, Bitcoin relies on reducing mining rewards.
The developer highlights that both systems have their mechanisms for ensuring sustainability and questions whether the “ultrasound money” narrative for Ethereum is exaggerated. Despite burning a significant amount of ETH since the implementation of EIP-1559, Ethereum remains somewhat inflationary, although its issuance rate has been steadily decreasing.
The Road to Sustainability: Ethereum’s Token Burning Efforts
Since the implementation of EIP-1559, Ethereum has burned over 3.9 million ETH while issuing more than 6.9 million. This data confirms that Ethereum has been actively burning tokens but still maintains some level of inflation compared to Bitcoin.
While the “ultrasound money” narrative may have its merits, it is important to understand the nuances of Ethereum’s monetary policy and not rely solely on optimistic assumptions. Ethereum’s tokenomics are evolving, and sustainability remains a key focus for the network.
Hot Take: The Real Story Behind Ethereum’s Monetary Policy
The “ultrasound money” narrative surrounding Ethereum has sparked debates within the community. While some believe in its potential as a deflationary asset, others argue that it may be exaggerated. Ultimately, Ethereum’s monetary policy aims to strike a balance between inflation and deflation while ensuring sustainability. Through burning gas fees, Ethereum reduces its issuance rate and becomes more deflationary over time. However, it is crucial to consider the complexities of tokenomics and not rely solely on optimistic assumptions. As Ethereum continues to evolve, its path towards sustainability remains a key factor to watch.
By
By
By
