• Home
  • Blockchain
  • Vitalik Buterin, Co-Founder of Ethereum, Highlights Validiums as Ineffective Rollup Solutions
Vitalik Buterin, Co-Founder of Ethereum, Highlights Validiums as Ineffective Rollup Solutions

Vitalik Buterin, Co-Founder of Ethereum, Highlights Validiums as Ineffective Rollup Solutions

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Validium Classification

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has sparked a debate over the classification of layer 2 scaling solutions. He argues that Ethereum’s validiums should not be considered genuine rollup solutions. This came in response to a post by Daniel Wang, founder of Taiko, who stated that if an Ethereum rollup relies on an external data chain, it should be classified as a validium. Buterin agreed with this statement, emphasizing the importance of unconditional security guarantees in rollups. He believes that if data availability depends on an external system, the security guarantee cannot be upheld.

Understanding Validium

Validium is a scaling solution for Ethereum that uses zero-knowledge proofs for off-chain transactions while relying on the Ethereum mainnet for security. Unlike ZK-rollups, which batch transactions on a layer 2 network and verify them on Ethereum’s layer 1, validium networks do not post transaction data to layer 1. Instead, they post cryptographic proofs of transaction validity to achieve higher scalability. However, validiums face challenges with data availability as they rely on operators to honestly post proofs.

Debate Over Validium Classification

While Buterin’s views gained support, others disagreed. Ryan Berckmans argued that validiums should be considered layer 2 networks since they settle on Ethereum. However, L2Beat, an industry analytics platform, contradicted this view and stated that validiums are not layer 2 solutions. They claim that validiums introduce additional trust assumptions by not publishing data on layer 1. Arbitrum, an Ethereum-based layer 2 network, currently dominates the market share among layer 2 networks.

Hot Take: Validiums and Rollup Solutions

Vitalik Buterin’s argument regarding the classification of validiums as genuine rollup solutions has ignited a debate within the Ethereum community. While some agree with his perspective, others believe that validiums should be considered layer 2 networks. This disagreement stems from different interpretations of the term “layer 2” and the requirements for being classified as such. As the discussion continues, it is important to consider the implications of these classifications on scalability, security, and trust assumptions. Ultimately, finding common ground and establishing clear definitions will contribute to the development of effective scaling solutions for Ethereum and other blockchain platforms.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

Vitalik Buterin, Co-Founder of Ethereum, Highlights Validiums as Ineffective Rollup Solutions