Plaintiffs Call for Subpoena of Cristiano Ronaldo in Binance Lawsuit
Plaintiffs in the lawsuit against Cristiano Ronaldo’s Binance campaign are requesting that the footballer be subpoenaed through social media. They argue that reaching him in Saudi Arabia, where he currently resides, is challenging.
The plaintiffs propose using email and social media to contact Ronaldo and publishing the lawsuit documents on a website. They claim that The Hague Conventions do not prohibit these methods of serving court papers.
Cristiano Ronaldo’s Residence is Unknown
The plaintiffs state that Ronaldo’s whereabouts are unknown, as his last known residence was at the Four Seasons Hotel Riyadh At Kingdom Center in Saudi Arabia. However, they believe that serving him a court summons via X, a platform where he regularly posts, may be possible. They also suggest sending the court documents through email and a custom website.
Why the Ronaldo NFT Case Could Go to Trial
Digital asset lawyer Jemma Fleetwood suggests that Ronaldo may consult legal advisers and choose to settle the case. However, due to the delay in serving the summons, it is uncertain how long this process will take.
“Ronaldo will likely be discussing with his legal advisers whether the claim has legal merit, what his defence will be, and whether he should make an offer to settle the case.”
The court may dismiss claims based on a lack of causation, as celebrity endorsements do not force anyone to invest. Similar cases involving celebrity endorsers Kim Kardashian and Floyd Mayweather were dismissed for this reason. Ronaldo may argue that his promotions were unrelated to Binance’s activities.
Hot Take: The Challenges of Serving Cristiano Ronaldo in Binance Lawsuit
Plaintiffs in the Binance lawsuit against Cristiano Ronaldo are facing difficulties in serving him due to his unknown residence in Saudi Arabia. They propose using social media and email to contact him, as well as publishing the lawsuit documents on a website. However, the uncertainty of Ronaldo’s whereabouts and the delay in serving the summons may prolong the legal process. The court may also consider dismissing claims based on a lack of causation. Despite these challenges, the case could potentially go to trial, where both parties would be required to present evidence publicly.
By
By
By
By
By