The High Court of Singapore Rejects Three Arrows Capital’s Attempt to Dismiss Lawsuit
The High Court of Singapore has dismissed a motion filed by crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) in an ongoing lawsuit brought by Cheong Jun Yoong, founder of Defiance Capital. Cheong filed the lawsuit asserting that Defiance Capital investors should be considered the rightful owners of assets held in trust by 3AC. He argued that these funds should not be used to pay off 3AC’s debts. The court’s decision acknowledges the existence of a trust relationship between the parties, despite the wording of legal documents. It also establishes that the crypto assets in question are in trust and confirms Singapore as the appropriate forum for the lawsuit.
Background of the Dispute
Defiance Capital was established as a separate fund within the 3AC platform, utilizing 3AC’s resources while maintaining separate accounts and wallets. However, certain assets were not transferred when Defiance Capital was moved out of 3AC and restructured in Singapore. As of May 2022, Defiance Capital held significant holdings in USDT and various cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies. The dispute arose from the disagreement over the ownership and use of these assets.
Implications of the Court’s Decision
The court’s decision has important implications for the treatment of digital assets in trust disputes. It establishes that a trust relationship can exist, even if the legal documents do not explicitly state it. This ruling is significant for Defiance Capital and its investors, as it suggests that the assets under their control may be protected from being used to settle 3AC’s debts. It also sets a precedent for future cases involving digital assets and the application of trust law.
Hot Take: High Court of Singapore Supports Legal Standing of Digital Assets in Trust Disputes
The recent decision by the High Court of Singapore to reject Three Arrows Capital’s attempt to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Defiance Capital founder Cheong Jun Yoong affirms the legal standing of digital assets in trust disputes. The court’s ruling acknowledges the existence of a trust relationship between the parties involved, challenging the argument that the assets were not in trust. This decision is significant for the crypto industry as it establishes a precedent for the treatment of digital assets and the application of trust law. It provides hope for Defiance Capital and its investors while also highlighting the need for clear legal frameworks to govern the ownership and use of digital assets.