The Case is Pretty Much Over: Akerman on Trump Trial
In a recent interview, Nick Akerman, a former Assistant US Attorney and Watergate Prosecutor, shared his insights on the ongoing Trump trial. Akerman discusses the testimony of Michael Cohen and the impact it may have on the case, highlighting the lack of credibility in the defense’s argument.
Michael Cohen’s Testimony
During the trial, Michael Cohen’s testimony revealed crucial details about the payments made to Stormy Daniels and others. The prosecutors’ questions aligned with the expectations, but the defense’s cross-examination focused on undermining Cohen’s credibility and portraying him as someone with a vendetta against Trump.
- Cohen’s responses to questions about Trump’s conviction and prior statements could potentially weaken his credibility as a witness.
- However, Akerman believes that at this stage, Cohen’s testimony, supported by other witnesses and documentation, has already established a strong case against Trump.
Defense’s Challenge
The defense’s argument relies heavily on discrediting Cohen as a witness, but Akerman points out that the case is not just Cohen versus Trump. With multiple cooperating witnesses and substantial evidence, the defense lacks a solid theory to present to the jury.
- Akerman highlights the catch-and-kill scheme involving David Pecker, Trump, and Cohen, supported by various documents and witness testimonies.
- The defense’s claim of Cohen’s vendetta falls short in comparison to the overwhelming evidence presented by the prosecution.
Impact on the Jury
As the trial progresses, Michael Cohen’s apology for his past actions may influence the jury’s perception. The jury, already sensitized to the case, may consider Cohen’s remorse as a factor in evaluating his credibility as a witness.
- Akerman suggests that the jury’s reaction could play a crucial role in the outcome of the trial, as they assess Cohen’s credibility in light of the entire case.
- Despite the defense’s attempts to discredit Cohen, the strength of the evidence presented by the prosecution may overshadow any efforts to undermine Cohen’s testimony.
Hot Take: Closing Thoughts on the Trump Trial
In conclusion, the Trump trial has reached a critical juncture where Michael Cohen’s testimony, supported by corroborating evidence and witness testimonies, presents a compelling case against Trump. The defense’s focus on discrediting Cohen’s credibility may not be sufficient to counter the overwhelming evidence presented. As the trial nears its conclusion, the lack of a solid defense theory leaves the defense at a disadvantage. The outcome of the trial hangs in the balance, as the jury deliberates on the credibility of witnesses and the strength of the evidence presented.
By
By
By
By