Sorting by

×
  • Home
  • AI
  • Crypto stakeholders engage White House on regs

Crypto stakeholders engage White House on regs

Image

Crypto Insiders Storm the White House GatesCopy

Crypto stakeholders engage White House on regs? Yeah, it’s happening-big time. The White House Crypto Policy Council just wrapped its third meeting with crypto execs, trade groups, and TradFi heavyweights, hashing out digital asset market structure legislation. Progress? Check. Deal sealed? Nah, not yet. But the vibes are productive, and regulators are dropping hints like breadcrumbs.[1][5]

Key Takeaways from the Hill-to-Crypto BridgeCopy

  • Third round-down, no knockout: Meetings on Feb. 19 focused on stablecoin yield-banks want prohibitions, crypto wants wiggle room. White House pushing for compromise by March 1.[4][5]
  • SEC’s innovation tease: Chairman Paul Atkins eyes a framework for crypto-assets with an “innovation exemption” for tokenized securities. Think whitelisted on-chain trading in AMMs-temporary, but a game-changer for liquidity.[1][5]
  • CFTC flexes on prediction markets: Filed an amicus brief claiming exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts as “swaps.” Chairman Michael Selig says it’s plain-language law.[1]
  • Banking chorus unites: ABA, BPI, and pals issued a joint statement post-meeting, stressing safe lending over crypto wildness. “Protect families and small biz,” they say.[6][7]
  • Treasury cheer: Sec. Scott Bessent urges everyone to align: “Safe, sound practices plus crypto freedom.”[3]

Subscribe to our Social Media for Exclusive Crypto News and Insights 24/7!

Stablecoin Yield: The Sticky Point That’s Got Everyone ArguingCopy

Picture this: Banks freak over yield-bearing stablecoins siphoning deposits that fund your neighbor’s small business loan. They dropped a “Yield and Interest Prohibition Principles” doc at the second meeting-straight-up bans on any perks for holding payment stablecoins.[4] Crypto side? Pushing back hard. White House hosted round two on this exact beef, calling it “productive” but directing teams to tweak language.[3][4]

You’ve seen this dance before, right? TradFi guarding their turf while crypto screams for clarity. No wonder the third meet on Feb. 19 kept grinding-no agreement, but “progress made.”[1][5] Banking trades like BPI warn stablecoins could “reduce bank deposits and lending,” citing even crypto-funded research. Ouch.[7]

SEC and CFTC: Regulators Warming Up to Crypto’s BeatCopy

SEC Chair Paul Atkins isn’t just talking-he’s outlining. Expects a crypto framework soon, including that innovation exemption: “Issuers tokenize securities, whitelist buyers/sellers, trade on-chain in AMMs.” He paints tokenization as a system-shaker: shorter settlements, easier collateral moves, proxy voting on steroids.[5] Hester Peirce chimes in: “Project devs shouldn’t fear tokens with revenue claims being securities.”[5]

CFTC? They’re marking territory. Amicus brief to the Ninth Circuit: Prediction markets are their swaps domain.[1] Chairman Selig told Congress market structure bill could hit the Prez’s desk in months.[3] And get this-SEC/CFTC’s “Project Crypto” is coordinating exemptions for on-chain action. Clarity incoming, fam.

Banking’s Not Budging-But They’re at the TableCopy

Banks ain’t sleeping on this. Post-meeting joint statement from ABA, BPI, etc.: “Thanks for the chat, White House. But legislation must back local lending and system safety.”[6][7] They’re lobbying hard-letters to Senate on stablecoin risks, CEO missives closing “loopholes.” Community bankers urging protection from deposit drains. It’s pragmatic pushback: Crypto freedom? Sure. But not at the cost of Main Street loans.

Honestly, that united front caught me off guard. TradFi showing up three meets in a row? Signals they’re invested-or spooked.

Tokenization and Futures: Institutional Green LightsCopy

Beyond meetings, momentum builds. SEC’s Division of Trading issued FAQ on stablecoins under broker-dealer rules.[1] CFTC tweaked a no-action letter for payment stablecoins from national trust banks.[3] CME? Launching 24/7 crypto futures/options May 29, plus tokenized collateral plays. CEO Terry Duffy: Exploring their own coin on decentralized nets.[3]

Tokenization could “transform the financial system,” per Atkins. Imagine bespoke portfolios zipping on-chain. But whitelisting keeps it safe-ish. Smart.

What’s Next? Eyes on March 1 DeadlineCopy

No crystal ball here, but sources scream coordination. Atkins: “SEC won’t bless every innovation or resist change-we’ll evolve rules.”[4] Bessent: Get this bill signed.[3] Congress advancing via NS3.AI-tracked bill.[2] If they nail stablecoin yield, market structure legislation rolls.

You’re in crypto for the long game, right? These meets aren’t hype-they’re rails for trillions. Whales watching close. Stay tuned.

  1. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/white-house-hosts-third-meeting-between-4842582/
  2. https://www.binance.com/en-TR/square/post/02-01-2026-white-house-engages-with-cryptocurrency-stakeholders-amid-regulatory-developments-35878432138409
  3. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/white-house-hosts-crypto-meetings-2160942/
  4. https://www.paulhastings.com/insights/crypto-policy-tracker/white-house-hosts-second-crypto-meeting-on-stablecoin-yield-sec-highlights-structure-and-tokenization
  5. https://www.paulhastings.com/insights/crypto-policy-tracker/white-house-hosts-third-meeting-between-banking-and-crypto-stakeholders
  6. https://www.aba.com/about-us/press-room/press-releases/joint-statement-white-house-crypto-meeting
  7. https://bpi.com/banking-trades-statement-on-white-house-crypto-market-structure-meeting/

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

Source

Crypto stakeholders engage White House on regs