Decentralized Governance Issues Can Be Solved Using Machiavellian Principles, Says a16z
A blog post by venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) argues that Niccolò Machiavelli’s principles from nearly 500 years ago can be applied to address decentralized governance issues in autonomous organizations. The post, written by a16z’s general counsel and head of decentralization, Miles Jennings, suggests that Machiavelli’s philosophy offers insights into the struggles of social power that are similar to those experienced by crypto protocols and their decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).
Machiavelli’s Principles for Decentralized Governance
Jennings explores how Machiavelli’s work can help prevent power centralization within DAOs. The first principle discussed is the need to limit governance by shifting many decisions to the client or third-party layer, reducing the burden on the protocol. The second principle emphasizes the importance of balancing power among leadership classes to prevent autocracy, suggesting a bicameral governance layer similar to the United States Congress. Token-based voting systems alone are unlikely to eliminate autocracy. The third principle highlights the necessity of creating a churn in leadership positions to prevent a static power balance and allow new leaders to emerge.
Enhancing Accountability in DAOs
Jennings also suggests that DAOs should implement lockup mechanisms for holders participating in stakeholder councils to enhance accountability throughout their ecosystems. He acknowledges that community members often face financial barriers in token-based voting systems, limiting their ability to acquire power. By incentivizing competition, empowering rivals, and utilizing non-token-based voting systems, DAOs can drive greater progress and promote decentralization over censorship.
Hot Take: Applying Ancient Wisdom to Modern Challenges
The application of Machiavellian principles to decentralized governance in web3 offers a unique perspective on addressing the shortcomings of DAOs. By learning from the past, crypto communities can navigate the complexities of power dynamics and strive for more inclusive and effective decision-making processes. While Machiavelli’s ideas may be controversial, they provide valuable insights into the challenges faced by decentralized organizations. Embracing these principles can contribute to the evolution of web3 and promote greater transparency, accountability, and progress in the crypto space.