The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) Initiates Civil Penalty Proceedings Against Bit Trade
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has taken legal action against Bit Trade Pty Ltd, the provider of Kraken crypto exchange services in Australia. ASIC alleges that Bit Trade failed to comply with design and distribution obligations for its margin trading product offered to Australian users. This could result in potential declarations, pecuniary penalties, and injunctions for Bit Trade.
A Loss of Nearly $13 Million for Australian Customers
Since October 2021, at least 1,160 Australian customers have used Bit Trade’s margin trading product, resulting in a total loss of approximately $12.95 million AUD. ASIC aims to send a message to the crypto industry that products will be scrutinized to ensure compliance with regulatory obligations.
The “Margin Extension” Controversy
Bit Trade’s margin trading product allows users to receive credit up to five times the value of their collateral assets, referred to as a “margin extension.” ASIC argues that this product should be considered a “credit facility” and subject to additional regulatory scrutiny.
Bit Trade’s Response
Jonathan Miller, Managing Director of Kraken’s Australian operations, expressed surprise and disappointment at ASIC’s legal action. Bit Trade has been attempting to engage with ASIC constructively on this matter to ensure compliance. Both parties are expected to make further public statements as the case progresses.
ASIC Seeks Legal Remedies
ASIC is seeking various legal remedies, including declarations, pecuniary penalties, and injunctions against Bit Trade for its alleged failure to comply with design and distribution obligations. A date for the first case management hearing has not yet been set.
Hot Take: ASIC Takes Legal Action Against Bit Trade for Design and Distribution Failures
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has filed civil penalty proceedings against Bit Trade Pty Ltd, accusing the crypto exchange provider of not meeting design and distribution obligations for its margin trading product. This move comes after Australian customers incurred a loss of nearly $13 million while using Bit Trade’s product. The controversy revolves around whether the margin trading product should be classified as a “credit facility” and subjected to additional regulatory scrutiny. Bit Trade has expressed surprise and disappointment at ASIC’s action, stating that they have been attempting to engage with the regulatory body to ensure compliance. As the case progresses, both parties will provide further clarification on their positions.
By
By
By
By
By