Cambridge Revises Bitcoin Energy Estimates

Cambridge Revises Bitcoin Energy Estimates


The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) revises its Bitcoin electricity consumption estimates

  • Daniel Batten, a prominent climate activist and Bitcoin environmental analyst, confirms the accuracy of the revised estimates
  • The CCAF model overestimated BTC energy demand by 16.8% in 2021 and 10.2% in 2022
  • CCAF debunks Greenpeace USA’s claim that Bitcoin uses as much energy as Sweden
  • CCAF’s new estimates equate Bitcoin’s energy use to “tumble dryers in the US”
  • CCAF’s emissions estimates are still overestimated by 67.6% due to outdated calculations

The reasons behind the discrepancies in the previous model

  • The assumption that every profitable hardware model released less than 5 years ago fueled the total network hashrate led to overrepresentation of older devices
  • Newer equipment was found to be underrepresented, resulting in revised estimates for 2021 and 2022

The tide has turned in the narrative around Bitcoin and energy

  • Acknowledgments from Cambridge, academic papers, and a KPMG report give Bitcoin a positive ESG rating
  • Misinformation still persists from outlets like the NY Times and Greenpeace USA
  • There is work to be done in educating the public about Bitcoin’s energy consumption

Hot Take: The process has begun, and the tide has turned

Read Disclaimer
This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. Lolacoin.org does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.

The revised estimates from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) provide a more accurate assessment of Bitcoin’s electricity consumption. The overestimations from their previous model have been corrected, debunking claims that Bitcoin uses as much energy as Sweden. However, there is still room for improvement in emissions estimates due to outdated calculations. The revised estimates signify a positive shift in the narrative around Bitcoin and energy, with acknowledgments from reputable sources and a positive ESG rating. While misinformation still exists, progress has been made in educating the public about Bitcoin’s energy consumption.

Cambridge Revises Bitcoin Energy Estimates
Author – Contributor at Lolacoin.org | Website

Bitro Conwell stands as an intellectual architect, weaving together the roles of crypto analyst, meticulous researcher, and editorial virtuoso with finesse. Amidst the digital intricacies of cryptocurrencies, Bitro’s insights resonate harmoniously with seekers of all stripes, showcasing a profound understanding. His ability to untangle the most complex threads within the crypto landscape seamlessly pairs his their editorial finesse, transforming intricacy into an artful tapestry of comprehension. Guiding both seasoned pioneers and curious newcomers, Bitro’s insights forge a compass for astute decision-making within the ever-evolving cryptoverse. With the craftsmanship of a linguistic artisan, they craft narratives that enrich the evolving chronicle of the crypto cosmos.