Concerns Raised About Blast API’s Security and Decentralization
In a recent social media discussion, Jarrod Watts, a developer relations engineer at Polygon Labs, expressed significant concerns about the security and decentralization of the newly launched Blast API network. Watts argued that Blast’s centralization could pose serious security risks to its users.
Allegations Against Blast API
Watts claimed that Blast operates on a “3/5 multisig” system, where transactions can be executed if three out of five designated team members agree. According to Watts, this setup makes Blast vulnerable because an attacker only needs to compromise the keys of three team members to seize control of all cryptocurrency deposited in the team’s contracts.
Watts provided detailed analysis and graphics to support his allegations. He explained that a new wallet, 0x52c31, was used to deposit two “proxy contracts,” which were then transferred to a Gnosis Safe smart contract.
Furthermore, Watts argued that Blast does not qualify as a Layer 2 (L2) network. He stated that the Blast smart contract simply accepts user funds and stakes them in other protocols like LIDO, without offering typical L2 features.
Blast Team’s Response
The Blast team did not directly address Watts’ allegations. Instead, they claimed that Blast’s decentralization is comparable to other Layer 2 solutions such as Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism.
Blast Network’s marketing materials describe it as “the only Ethereum L2 with native yield for ETH and stablecoins.” The website further explains that stablecoins deposited in Blast are converted to “USDB,” a stablecoin that compounds using MakerDAO’s T-Bill protocol. This allows users to auto-compound their balances.
However, the Blast team has not released technical documentation detailing the protocol’s operations. They have announced that these documents will be made public alongside an airdrop scheduled for January.
Conclusion
The debate between Jarrod Watts and the Blast team raises concerns in the cryptocurrency community regarding security and decentralization in emerging networks. The community eagerly awaits further details and technical insights from the Blast team as the situation develops.
Hot Take: Security and Decentralization Concerns Surrounding Blast API
The recent discussion about the security and decentralization of Blast API has sparked significant interest and concern within the crypto community. Jarrod Watts, a developer relations engineer, raised valid points about the potential vulnerabilities of Blast’s centralization and its qualification as a Layer 2 network.
While the Blast team has defended their decentralization approach, they have yet to address Watts’ specific allegations. The lack of technical documentation further adds to the skepticism surrounding Blast’s operations.
As this debate unfolds, it highlights the need for transparency and robust security measures in emerging networks. Cryptocurrency enthusiasts eagerly await more information from the Blast team to assess the validity of these concerns.
By
By
By
By
By
By