The Fee-Dependent Design in the Lightning Network
Bitcoin’s Lightning Network was created as a solution to scale the Bitcoin mainchain and reduce congestion by enabling off-chain transactions. However, it was designed with the assumption that on-chain transaction fees would be low, making it affordable to open and close channels. This assumption is now being challenged as Bitcoin transaction fees continue to rise, rendering existing Lightning channels ineffective due to the high reserves required for a single payment. Urgent action is needed to address this problem.
Real-World Experiments About Bitcoin’s Lightning Network (LN) Fees
Recent experiments conducted by Samson Mow with popular Lightning Network wallets reveal the challenges users face in the current fee environment.
1) Breez: High Setup Fee Hurdles
The Breez wallet imposes a 1% setup fee, which is prohibitively expensive for new Bitcoin users. This raises concerns about the scalability of the Lightning Network.
2) Phoenix: Fee Configuration Quandary
The Phoenix wallet presents difficulties in sending funds, requiring users to set a maximum fee amount. This creates usability issues for new users and increases the risk of losing incoming payments.
3) WoS: Stuck in Pending Limbo
The Wallet of Satoshi remains a popular choice due to its no-KYC feature. However, attempts to remove all funds from the wallet resulted in a persistent “pending” status, raising doubts about the reliability of Lightning Network operations.
The core issue lies in the fee-dependent design of the Lightning Network. These observations and experiments highlight the need to address these concerns and reevaluate the design and functionality of the Lightning Network to ensure its long-term viability as a scalable solution.
Hot Take: The Future of Lightning Network’s Scalability
As Bitcoin transaction fees continue to soar, the assumption that the Lightning Network can provide a scalable solution is unraveling. Urgent action is needed to reevaluate the design and functionality of the Lightning Network in order to address the challenges posed by high transaction fees. Without addressing these concerns, the long-term viability of the Lightning Network as a second-layer scaling solution for Bitcoin may be at risk.
By
By
By
By