• Home
  • Binance
  • Circle Asserts that Stablecoins are Not Considered Securities in Binance Legal Dispute
Circle Asserts that Stablecoins are Not Considered Securities in Binance Legal Dispute

Circle Asserts that Stablecoins are Not Considered Securities in Binance Legal Dispute

Circle Intervenes in SEC vs. Binance Case, Arguing Stablecoins Should Not Be Classified as Securities

In the ongoing legal battle between the SEC and Binance, stablecoin issuer Circle has intervened, asserting that stablecoins should not be categorized as securities under existing financial regulations. This comes after Binance faced legal accusations from regulators earlier this year for enabling transactions in multiple cryptocurrencies that the SEC claimed were unregistered securities.

Circle Challenges SEC’s Categorization of Stablecoins

Circle argues that stablecoins like BUSD and USDC, designed for payments, are not investment contracts and fall outside of SEC jurisdiction. According to Circle, decades of case law support the view that an asset sale without any post-sale promises or obligations does not establish an investment contract. They also argue that users of stablecoins do not expect to gain profits from individual purchases, countering the SEC’s accusation that Binance promoted BUSD by offering yield through reward programs.

SEC’s Lawsuit Against Binance

The SEC alleges that Binance enabled transactions in cryptocurrencies such as SOL, ADA, and BUSD, which they consider unregistered securities. The SEC claims that Binance presented BUSD as an investment contract through promotional activities offering yield. In response, Binance filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that the regulator exceeded its authority. Circle’s involvement as an amicus curiae was supported by its Chief Legal Officer and former chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Hot Take: Circle’s Intervention Highlights Regulatory Uncertainty Surrounding Stablecoins

The intervention by Circle in the SEC vs. Binance case sheds light on the ongoing debate about whether stablecoins should be classified as securities. As more regulatory scrutiny is placed on digital assets, it becomes crucial to define the regulatory framework for stablecoins. Circle’s argument that stablecoins designed for payments do not meet the criteria of investment contracts adds an important perspective to the discussion. This case has broader implications for the cryptocurrency industry as it navigates regulatory challenges and seeks clarity on how different types of digital assets should be regulated.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

Circle Asserts that Stablecoins are Not Considered Securities in Binance Legal Dispute