Elon Musk, Mark Cuban, and Others Raise Concerns About SEC’s Approach to Internal Proceedings
Elon Musk, Mark Cuban, and several others have joined forces to submit a shared amicus brief to the Supreme Court of the United States. The purpose of this submission is to express their concerns about the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) approach to conducting internal proceedings without involving juries.
Disparate Outcomes and Constitutional Rights
Musk and Cuban argue that the SEC’s administrative proceedings result in different outcomes for individuals facing charges. They believe that this approach may violate the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial as outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
The SEC vs. Jarkesy Case
This legal challenge revolves around the SEC vs. Jarkesy case, where George Jarkesy claims his Seventh Amendment rights were violated. He argues that the SEC’s internal adjudication process, overseen by an administrative law judge appointed by the commission and without a jury, contradicts these rights.
A Shift in the SEC’s Approach
Musk, Cuban, and other amici curiae point out a change in the SEC’s approach between 2013 and 2014. They note that the commission started handling more cases internally rather than through federal courts after facing unsuccessful insider trading cases tried before juries.
Musk’s Ongoing Legal Disputes with the SEC
This is not Musk’s first encounter with the SEC. He has previously been involved in two legal disputes with the regulatory agency in 2018 and 2019. Currently, the SEC is seeking Musk’s testimony regarding his acquisition of Twitter and his public statements about the transaction.
The Impact on Investors and Markets
The amici curiae firmly argue that opting for administrative proceedings over federal court juries contradicts the SEC’s mission. They believe such decisions could potentially have negative consequences for investors and the markets that the SEC aims to protect.
Hot Take: Musk and Cuban Join Forces Against SEC’s Internal Proceedings
Elon Musk and Mark Cuban, along with other notable figures, have united to express their concerns about the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s approach to conducting internal proceedings without involving juries. They argue that this practice leads to unequal outcomes and may infringe upon the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. This legal challenge, centered around the SEC vs. Jarkesy case, highlights a shift in the SEC’s handling of cases and raises questions about its impact on investors and markets. With Musk facing his third legal dispute with the SEC, it remains to be seen how this collaboration will influence the future of the commission’s internal proceedings.
By
By
By
By
By
By