• Home
  • Blockchain
  • Comparing Monolithic and Modular Blockchains: Which is Better?
Comparing Monolithic and Modular Blockchains: Which is Better?

Comparing Monolithic and Modular Blockchains: Which is Better?

Understanding Layer-2 Scaling Solutions in the Crypto World

If you’ve been exploring the world of cryptocurrencies, you may have come across various types of tokens, each with its own unique features and functions. One type of token that has gained popularity recently is layer-2 scaling solutions. These tokens, such as Optimism, Arbitrum, and Polygon zkEVM, aim to address the challenges faced by blockchain networks like Ethereum.

Ethereum’s founder, Vitalik Buterin, introduced the concept of the Blockchain Trilemma, which states that a blockchain network strives to be secure, fast, and decentralized. However, achieving all three goals simultaneously is a difficult task. Ethereum, for instance, is known for its security and decentralization but suffers from slow transaction speeds. Transactions on the Ethereum network can take up to an hour to finalize during periods of congestion.

Early blockchains like Ethereum attempted to handle all blockchain functions independently. This is comparable to a restaurant manager who takes orders, cooks food, handles cash registers, and cleans tables all by themselves. As a result, long waiting times occur as customers have to wait for the manager to complete multiple tasks before attending to their needs.

Layer-2 scaling solutions offer a different approach. They offload certain blockchain functions and only settle the final transaction on the Ethereum chain. From a user’s perspective, it may seem like Ethereum is still handling the entire transaction process. However, layer-2 chains handle the front-end portion of transactions.

The main goal of layer-2 scaling solutions is to address Ethereum’s slow transaction speeds and high gas fees. For example, users purchasing an NFT may not be willing to pay $50 in transaction fees for a $200 NFT. However, if the transaction fee is reduced to $5 by utilizing a layer-2 scaling solution that ultimately settles on Ethereum, users may find it more appealing.

On the other hand, when dealing with high-value transactions worth millions of dollars, users may prioritize the security provided by Ethereum and be willing to pay higher gas fees for peace of mind.

The Role of Layer-2 Scaling Solutions

Layer-2 scaling solutions operate similarly to a restaurant scenario where customers interact with waiters and servers for ordering, serving, and payment. However, they don’t directly see the chef who prepares their food. In the case of layer-2 scaling solutions, they function on top of Ethereum but provide improved scalability and transaction speed.

One challenge that arises from having multiple layer-2 tokens on Ethereum is the lack of interoperability. Each distributed application (dApp) may require a specific layer-2 solution, similar to using non-interchangeable poker chips at different casinos. Although there are bridging mechanisms available between these assets, each transfer incurs gas fees.

Whether layer-2 scaling solutions will dominate other monolithic layer-1 blockchains that aim to handle all functions remains uncertain. However, the upcoming wave of layer-2 tokens seems poised to address the scalability issues faced by Ethereum and provide users with faster transactions and lower fees.

Hot Take: The Future of Layer-2 Scaling Solutions

In conclusion, layer-2 scaling solutions have emerged as a promising solution for improving the scalability and efficiency of blockchain networks like Ethereum. By offloading certain functions to layer-2 chains and settling final transactions on Ethereum, these solutions aim to offer faster transaction speeds and lower fees to users.

While it’s still uncertain whether layer-2 scaling solutions will surpass all-in-one layer-1 blockchains in terms of dominance, they are undoubtedly gaining traction in the crypto world. As more layer-2 tokens enter the market, it’s clear that addressing Ethereum’s scalability challenges is a top priority for developers and users alike.

As the crypto industry continues to evolve, layer-2 scaling solutions will play a significant role in shaping the future of blockchain technology, offering improved user experiences and unlocking new possibilities for decentralized applications.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

Comparing Monolithic and Modular Blockchains: Which is Better?