Crypto Lender Celsius Native Token Valued at $0.80 Despite Market Manipulation Allegations

Crypto Lender Celsius Native Token Valued at $0.80 Despite Market Manipulation Allegations


Creditors of Bankrupt Crypto Lender Argue for Higher Valuation

Some creditors of the bankrupt crypto lender are arguing that it should be valued at a higher price of $0.80, the nominal price when the company collapsed. However, the trading price on the day the crypto lender filed for bankruptcy was $0.80. The company argues that the trading prices don’t reflect reality due to market manipulation. The court could even value it at a lower or zero price, similar to what stockholders could expect in bankruptcy.

Key Points:
– Creditors argue for a higher valuation of $0.80 for the bankrupt crypto lender.
– The trading price on the day of bankruptcy filing was $0.80.
– The company claims the trading prices were manipulated.
– The court could value the lender’s token at a lower or zero price.
– Judge rejects token holders’ request to participate in bankruptcy negotiations.

Judge Martin Glenn also rejected the request of two token holders to participate in the bankruptcy negotiations. He emphasized that his decision does not determine whether crypto tokens are securities under federal securities laws. Celsius’ management has proposed a valuation of $0.25 for the token as they aim to wind up the company’s affairs and sell it to crypto consortium Fahrenheit. This valuation is higher than the previous $0.20 proposed. In January, an independent examiner appointed by Judge Glenn revealed that the market in CEL was largely created by the company itself, benefiting insiders such as the former CEO, Alex Mashinsky, who has been arrested on charges of market manipulation.

Read Disclaimer
This page is simply meant to provide information. It does not constitute a direct offer to purchase or sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a suggestion or endorsement of any goods, services, or businesses. Lolacoin.org does not offer accounting, tax, or legal advice. When using or relying on any of the products, services, or content described in this article, neither the firm nor the author is liable, directly or indirectly, for any harm or loss that may result. Read more at Important Disclaimers and at Risk Disclaimers.

Hot Take:
The valuation dispute highlights the challenges of determining the true value of crypto assets in bankruptcy cases. With allegations of market manipulation and regulatory concerns, it is crucial for the court to carefully consider the evidence and protect the interests of all parties involved.

Author – Contributor at Lolacoin.org | Website

Cora Skindell is a standout figure in the world of cryptocurrency analysis, research, and editorial expertise. As a seasoned crypto analyst and researcher, Cora’s insights delve deep into the complexities of digital assets, resonating with a diverse audience. Her ability to dissect intricate crypto concepts is complemented by her adept editorial skills, enabling her to distill complex information into easily understandable content. Cora’s contributions serve as a valuable compass for both seasoned and novice individuals seeking to navigate the dynamic landscape of cryptocurrencies. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to accuracy, she empowers informed decision-making in the ever-evolving crypto space.