A Former U.S. Hacker Questions the Confession in Bitfinex Bitcoin Hack
A former hacker, Brett Johnson, has expressed skepticism about the recent confession of Ilya Lichtenstein regarding the 2016 hacking theft of 112,000 bitcoins from Bitfinex. Johnson, who has experience in cybercrime, argues that Lichtenstein’s money laundering tactics were extremely flawed. The circumstances surrounding the confession remain unclear, and it is uncertain whether it was a condition of Lichtenstein’s plea deal on the money laundering charges. The stolen bitcoins were worth $70 million in 2016 but had increased to $4.3 billion by the time of the couple’s arrest. Lichtenstein’s alleged incompetence and questionable behavior after the hack raise doubts about the true nature of the crime.
Key Points:
- Brett Johnson, a former hacker, questions the recent confession of Ilya Lichtenstein regarding the 2016 Bitfinex bitcoin hack.
- Johnson argues that Lichtenstein’s money laundering tactics were poorly executed.
- The circumstances surrounding the confession remain unclear, and it is not known if it was a condition of Lichtenstein’s plea deal.
- The stolen bitcoins were worth $70 million in 2016 but had significantly increased in value by the time of the couple’s arrest.
- Lichtenstein’s alleged incompetence and unusual behavior after the hack cast doubt on the true nature of the crime.
Hot Take:
The confession of Ilya Lichtenstein in the Bitfinex bitcoin hack raises more questions than answers. The skepticism expressed by Brett Johnson, a former hacker himself, sheds light on the alleged incompetence of Lichtenstein’s money laundering attempts. The circumstances surrounding the confession and the couple’s behavior after the hack only add to the mystery. It is clear that there is more to the story, and further investigation is needed to uncover the truth behind this enduring crypto mystery.
By
By
By
By