• Home
  • Blockchain
  • Developments in SEC vs. Ripple Labs Legal Battle: Insights from Blockchain Association Counsel
Developments in SEC vs. Ripple Labs Legal Battle: Insights from Blockchain Association Counsel

Developments in SEC vs. Ripple Labs Legal Battle: Insights from Blockchain Association Counsel

The Legal Battle Between the SEC and Ripple Labs: Recent Developments and the Need for Higher Court Intervention

The legal battle between the SEC and Ripple Labs has seen significant developments, with insights provided by Marisa Tashman Coppel, Senior Counsel at Blockchain Association, on X (formerly known as Twitter) on 22 August 2023. Her tweets shed light on recent rulings by Judge Torres and Judge Rakoff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and the need for a higher court to weigh in on the status of XRP.

Judge Torres’s Ruling and SEC’s Appeal

  • Judge Torres granted the SEC’s request to file a motion for leave to file an interlocutory appeal.
  • The SEC subsequently filed the motion, essentially asking permission to appeal Judge Torres’s 13 July 2023 decision.
  • Ripple will respond, and the judge will decide whether to certify the case for appeal and whether to delay the trial.

Judge Rakoff’s Ruling in SEC v. Terraform Labs Case

  • On 1 August 2023, Judge Rakoff published his ruling in SEC v. Terraform Labs, denying Terra’s motion to dismiss.
  • Coppel reflects on how to reconcile these two opinions, noting that it’s easy to latch onto Rakoff’s statement rejecting Torres’s approach in Ripple but advises not taking it at face value.
  • Rakoff appears to reject the approach to distinguish between different purchasers, such as institutional vs. retail investors.

Comparison Between Rakoff and Torres’s Orders

  • Rakoff’s order decides a motion to dismiss, requiring the court to take allegations as true, with no discovery or external evidence.
  • However, like Torres, Rakoff analyzed if the marketing makes clear to both retail and institutional investors that the project benefits from purchases.

Need for Higher Court Intervention

  • Rakoff was not as clear as Torres that tokens do not, in and of themselves, represent investment contracts.
  • Coppel emphasizes that this is why a higher court needs to weigh in on the matter.

Hot Take: The legal battle between the SEC and Ripple Labs continues to unfold, with recent rulings by Judge Torres and Judge Rakoff raising questions about the status of XRP. The need for a higher court to intervene and provide clarity on key issues has become apparent. These developments have significant implications for the crypto industry, particularly for those invested in XRP. It remains to be seen how the case will progress and what impact it will have on the broader regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

Developments in SEC vs. Ripple Labs Legal Battle: Insights from Blockchain Association Counsel