• Home
  • AI
  • Dismissal of Artists’ Copyright Claims Against AI Companies—With Some Exceptions
Dismissal of Artists’ Copyright Claims Against AI Companies—With Some Exceptions

Dismissal of Artists’ Copyright Claims Against AI Companies—With Some Exceptions

Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Against AI-Image Generator and Art Community Platform

A U.S. District Judge has ruled that a lawsuit filed against AI-image generator Midjourney and digital art community platform DeviantArt will not proceed due to lack of evidence. The judge called the claims of copyright infringement “defective” and granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. However, the judge did allow a separate claim of infringement against AI developer Stability AI to move forward.

Generative AI and DeviantArt’s Role

The judge noted that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate how DeviantArt could be held responsible for gathering internet content, as it was done by LAION at the direction of Stability AI. Generative AI refers to AI programs that use prompts to generate various types of content.

Possible Copyright Infringement

The plaintiffs alleged that Stability AI violated copyright infringement laws, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), artists’ right of publicity, and the platforms’ terms of service. The judge acknowledged that the plaintiffs may have a case regarding direct infringement based on certain allegations.

Art Generated in the Style of an Artist

The artists claimed that art generated in the style of a given artist represents copyright infringement, as it is derived from copyrighted images. They argued that every hybrid image is necessarily a derivative work. Attorneys for Stability countered this by stating that identifying specific copyrighted works within the training data would be difficult.

Ongoing Battle Against Copyright Infringement and AI

This lawsuit is just one instance of the ongoing battle against copyright infringement and AI. In September, authors joined a lawsuit against ChatGPT creator OpenAI, alleging that their work was used in the chatbot’s training data. Universal Music Group also recently sued Claude AI developer Anthropic over claims of widespread infringement.

Hot Take: Copyright Lawsuits Highlight the Challenges of AI and Creative Works

The dismissal of the lawsuit against Midjourney and DeviantArt highlights the difficulties in holding AI-image generators and platforms accountable for copyright infringement. The case against Stability AI, however, will proceed, indicating that there may be potential grounds for direct infringement claims. As AI continues to advance, the intersection of technology and creative works raises complex legal questions that require careful consideration. The ongoing lawsuits serve as a reminder that finding a balance between innovation and intellectual property rights remains a challenge in the digital age.

Read Disclaimer
This content is aimed at sharing knowledge, it's not a direct proposal to transact, nor a prompt to engage in offers. Lolacoin.org doesn't provide expert advice regarding finance, tax, or legal matters. Caveat emptor applies when you utilize any products, services, or materials described in this post. In every interpretation of the law, either directly or by virtue of any negligence, neither our team nor the poster bears responsibility for any detriment or loss resulting. Dive into the details on Critical Disclaimers and Risk Disclosures.

Share it

Dismissal of Artists’ Copyright Claims Against AI Companies—With Some Exceptions