Understanding the DOJ’s Opposition to Tornado Cash Co-founder
As a crypto enthusiast, you may have heard about the recent developments regarding the US Department of Justice’s stance against Roman Storm, the developer of Tornado Cash. The DOJ’s opposition to Storm’s motion for dismissal has sparked concerns in the crypto market. Let’s delve deeper into the reasons behind this opposition and its implications for the crypto industry.
The DOJ’s Argument Against Roman Storm
In a court filing on April 26, the DOJ laid out its case against Roman Storm, co-founder of Tornado Cash, alleging several charges related to the operation of the crypto-mixing service. The charges include conspiring to commit money laundering, operating an unlicensed money transmitter, and violating sanctions imposed by OFAC.
- The DOJ believes Storm should be held accountable for the alleged crimes, challenging his attempt to dismiss the indictment by presenting his version of Tornado Cash’s operation.
- The authorities argue that the jury should determine the nature of Tornado Cash’s service, disputing Storm’s claim that the platform was not a money-transmitting business.
Contesting the Definition of Money Transmitters
One key point of contention revolves around the definition of money transmitters. The DOJ asserts that controlling funds is not a prerequisite for being classified as a money-transmitting business, citing Section 1960 regulations that extend the definition to include transferring funds on behalf of the public by any means.
“The definition of ‘money transmitting’ in Section 1960 does not require the money transmitter to have ‘control’ of the funds being transferred. The definition extends to ‘transferring funds on behalf of the public by any and all means,'” stated the DOJ legal team.
Industry Concerns and Reactions
The DOJ’s stance against Roman Storm has raised concerns among various stakeholders within the crypto community. Here are some reactions and viewpoints that have emerged in response to this development:
- Custodia Bank’s CEO, Caitlin Long, highlighted the broadened definition of money transmitters by the DOJ as a significant shift that contradicts existing FinCEN guidance.
- Amanda Tuminelli, Chief Legal Officer of Fund DeFi, criticized the DOJ’s position, pointing out technical inaccuracies and misapplications of the law in their filing.
- Freedom.Tech editor Seth suggested that the government’s long-term objective may involve targeting self-custody, citing evidence from the DOJ’s opposition to support this assertion.
“The DOJ’s opposition to Roman Storm’s motions to dismiss and suppress evidence in the Tornado Cash case is filled with technical inaccuracies, obvious disdain for privacy and emerging technology, and misapplication of the law,” Tuminelli added.
The Growing Regulatory Landscape
These developments come at a time when the US government is intensifying its enforcement efforts against crypto-related activities. Just last week, the authorities made headlines by arresting the co-founders of Samourai Wallet, a crypto mixer. The crypto community’s response to these actions indicates a growing unease with the expanding regulatory scrutiny in the sector.
Hot Take: Navigating Regulatory Challenges in the Crypto Space
As you navigate the evolving regulatory landscape in the crypto space, it’s essential to stay informed about the latest developments and understand the implications for the industry. The DOJ’s opposition to Roman Storm highlights the challenges faced by crypto innovators and the importance of regulatory compliance in ensuring the sector’s long-term viability.
By
By
By
By
By