The United States DOJ Seeks to Dismiss Expert Witnesses in SBF Trial
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) is attempting to dismiss seven expert witnesses proposed by Sam Bankman-Fried’s legal team in the trial against the disgraced founder of FTX. The DOJ claims that the witnesses’ opinions are inappropriate for expert testimony and irrelevant to the trial. They argue that allowing these witnesses to testify may confuse the jury. On the other hand, SBF’s team has also filed a motion to exclude the DOJ’s proposed expert witness from testifying, stating that his opinions are irrelevant to the case.
Key Points:
– The DOJ wants to preclude seven expert witnesses proposed by SBF’s legal team.
– The witnesses’ opinions are considered inappropriate and irrelevant to the trial.
– The DOJ argues that these witnesses’ testimonies may confuse the jury.
– SBF’s team is also seeking to prevent the DOJ’s expert witness from testifying.
– Both sides are attempting to exclude each other’s expert witnesses from the trial.
Closing Paragraph (Hot Take):
The dismissal of expert witnesses by the DOJ and SBF’s team highlights the contentious nature of the trial. Both sides are trying to shape the narrative by excluding witnesses with potentially unfavorable opinions. As the trial progresses, it will be interesting to see how the court rules on the admissibility of these expert testimonies and the impact it will have on the final outcome.
By
By
By
By