Hyperliquid ETFs draw $11M as Bitcoin, Ether funds bleed
US spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs posted a combined $112 million in net outflows on Monday, while two Hyperliquid-linked funds extended their eight-day inflow streak, underscoring a sharp split in crypto fund demand.[1][10] The move matters now because it shows capital continuing to rotate within digital assets even as broad-market ETF flows turn defensive.[1]
Key Metrics
- Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs lost $112 million in one session, signaling persistent selling pressure in the largest liquid crypto wrappers.[1]
- Hyperliquid ETFs took in $10.95 million on Monday, extending a daily inflow streak to eight sessions and indicating continued buyer interest.[1]
- The Hyperliquid funds opened their streak on May 13 and posted daily inflows throughout the period, including a $25.5 million peak on May 20.[1]
- CoinShares said broader digital asset products still drew $1.9 billion in weekly inflows, suggesting institutional demand has not disappeared, only shifted.[1]
- Bitcoin ETFs saw the bulk of the outflows, while Ethereum funds also slipped, showing the weakness was not isolated to one asset.[1]
- Tim Sun, a senior researcher at HashKey Group, told Decrypt the outflows reflected a mix of price action and higher Treasury yields, adding a macro layer to the selloff.[1]
Subscribe to our Social Media for Exclusive Crypto News and Insights 24/7!
Hyperliquid ETFs keep attracting money
The Hyperliquid funds’ eight-day run is the clearest sign of the day’s flow divergence.[1] According to the reporting cited by Decrypt, the two funds accumulated roughly $54 million over their first seven trading days and then added another $10.95 million on Monday.[1]
| Product group | Monday net flow | Recent streak | Market signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin ETFs | Outflows, led by the sector-wide drag | Negative on the day | Profit-taking and weaker risk appetite[1] |
| Ethereum ETFs | Outflows | Negative on the day | Continued softness in the largest altcoin wrapper[1] |
| Hyperliquid ETFs | +$10.95 million | 8 straight inflow days | New issuance still pulling capital[1] |
Market participants view the contrast as a sign that ETF investors are not exiting crypto wholesale, but are selectively reallocating into newer themes with stronger near-term momentum.[1] That said, the data also show how concentrated the demand still is: the Hyperliquid products are drawing relatively fresh capital, while the older Bitcoin and Ethereum funds remain more exposed to broad risk-off positioning.[1]
ETF outflows mask a rotation, not a clean exit
The broader backdrop remains mixed. CoinShares reported $1.9 billion of weekly inflows into digital asset investment products, which suggests the institutional bid has not disappeared even as Monday’s US ETF tape weakened.[1] The same report pointed to geopolitical strains and risk aversion as a drag on sentiment across multiple jurisdictions.[1]
That context matters for market structure. When Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs see outflows at the same time a newer token product attracts steady subscriptions, the message is less about one-sided capitulation and more about rotation within the crypto allocation bucket.[1] For traders, that can support relative performance in newer products without necessarily improving the broader market tape.
Why the flow split matters
The split also has implications for investor behavior. Traditional crypto ETFs remain the main liquidity gateway for institutions, so their outflows can pressure sentiment even when smaller products are still attracting money.[1] Hyperliquid’s streak shows there is still appetite for targeted exposure, but it is narrower and more dependent on momentum than the broad buying that drove earlier ETF cycles.[1]
A downside scenario is straightforward: if Bitcoin and Ethereum continue to weaken while Treasury yields stay elevated, the newer inflows may prove temporary and the rotation could fade quickly.[1] Another uncertainty is whether Hyperliquid’s demand reflects durable allocation or short-term trading around a fast-moving token and its newly listed funds.[1]
For now, the key signal is that crypto ETF demand is not disappearing. It is shifting, and the quality of that demand is becoming more selective, with newer products attracting incremental flows even as the biggest funds absorb redemptions.[1]
