Former CFTC Commissioner Criticizes SEC’s Stance on Ethereum
In a recent thread on X, former Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) commissioner Brian Quintenz voiced his criticism of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s approach to Ethereum (ETH). He argued that the SEC’s treatment of ETH is “illegal” and expressed concerns about potential regulatory confusion.
Ex-CFTC Commissioner Provides Clarity On Ethereum Classification
Quintenz highlighted the SEC’s approval of Ethereum futures ETFs on regulated security exchanges in October 2023. He emphasized that this decision implicitly acknowledged that Ethereum is a non-security and falls outside the jurisdiction of the SEC. According to Quintenz, if the SEC had any doubts about the regulatory treatment of ETH, it would not have approved the ETFs. He also pointed out that if Ethereum were considered a security, the futures contracts listed by the CFTC would be illegal.
Quintenz Responds To Regulatory Concerns
A user on X raised concerns about how regulators like the SEC might classify Ethereum and its potential as both a commodity and a security. In response, Quintenz explained that a commodity is considered a non-security if there is a CFTC-regulated futures or swaps contract on it. He emphasized the importance of regulatory oversight in determining the classification of assets.
The above-mentioned concerns stem from Prometheum’s request to offer custody services for Ethereum as a security. The SEC is yet to make a decision on this matter, but it has faced opposition from the CFTC.
Criticism of SEC’s Approach
Quintenz criticized the SEC for causing confusion and potentially harming the public by refusing to acknowledge that Ethereum is not a security. He questioned the agency’s justification for potential delays or denials of Ethereum ETFs, considering its previous acknowledgment that Ethereum falls outside its jurisdiction.
Conclusion
Former CFTC commissioner Brian Quintenz has raised concerns about the SEC’s treatment of Ethereum. He argues that the SEC’s approval of Ethereum futures ETFs implies that the agency considers Ethereum to be a non-security. Quintenz also criticizes the SEC for potentially causing confusion and harming the public by refusing to acknowledge this fact. The debate surrounding Ethereum’s classification and regulatory oversight continues, with stakeholders eagerly awaiting the SEC’s decision on Prometheum’s request for custody services.
Hot Take
Ethereum’s classification as a security or commodity has been a contentious issue in the cryptocurrency community. Former CFTC commissioner Brian Quintenz has criticized the SEC’s approach to Ethereum, arguing that its approval of Ethereum futures ETFs implies that the agency considers Ethereum to be a non-security. This raises questions about the SEC’s consistency and potential confusion in regulatory oversight. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how the SEC will respond to Prometheum’s request for custody services for Ethereum.
By
By
By