Pro-Crypto Republicans Challenge SEC Over Crypto Custody
Pro-crypto Republicans are gearing up to confront the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) this week over what they perceive as discouragement of banks from offering crypto custody services. The House of Representatives is set to vote on a resolution aimed at expressing congressional disapproval of the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121. The resolution, sponsored by Rep. Mike Flood (R-Nebraska), challenges the SEC’s guidance on risks associated with crypto custodians and the disclosure requirements under federal securities laws.
Contentions Against the SEC
Rep. Flood has criticized the SEC’s approach to SAB 121, arguing that the guidance signifies a controversial change in policy. He highlighted that the SEC deviated from the customary process for developing such bulletins, which typically involves consultation with Federal banking agencies. Flood expressed disappointment with the SEC’s handling of the situation and emphasized that SAB 121 has hindered banks and broker-dealers from providing custody services for crypto assets.
- Rep. Flood views SAB 121 as a significant hindrance to the traditional practice of safeguarding digital assets by regulated financial institutions.
- He asserts that the SEC’s warnings on risks specific to crypto custodians have deterred banks from engaging in crypto custody services, even after approving Bitcoin spot ETFs.
Legal Implications
While the resolution proposed by Rep. Flood does not carry legally binding implications, it serves as a representation of Congress’s collective stance on the matter. Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), a vocal critic of the SEC, endorsed Flood’s resolution, condemning SAB 121 as an illegal attempt by the SEC to exert regulatory authority over the broader crypto industry.
- Emmer argues that SAB 121 introduces unnecessary risks and concentration into the digital asset ecosystem, potentially hampering market fairness and efficiency.
- He notes that foreign banks are already active in this space, placing the U.S. at a competitive disadvantage.
Impact on Crypto Companies
The SEC’s regulatory actions have targeted major players in the crypto industry, including exchanges, custodial service providers, and software development teams, through lawsuits. Companies like Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, Uniswap Labs, and Robinhood have been subject to legal scrutiny by the SEC.
- The SEC’s scrutiny and legal actions against prominent crypto firms have stirred concerns within the industry regarding regulatory clarity and compliance.
- The ongoing regulatory challenges could impact the growth and development of the crypto sector, hindering innovation and investment.
Resolution and Legislative Process
If the joint resolution, titled H.J.Res.109, garners approval in the House, it will proceed to the Senate for further consideration. The companion resolution in the Senate, S.J.Res.59, has yet to advance beyond the committee stage. The resolution would require a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers to become law.
Hot Take:
The conflict between pro-crypto Republicans and the SEC regarding crypto custody regulations underscores the broader debate surrounding regulatory clarity and oversight in the crypto industry. As policymakers navigate these challenges, the outcome of this legislative standoff could have significant implications for the future of crypto custody services and regulatory frameworks.
By
By
By
By