Hester Peirce Calls for More Effective Crypto Regulation
At the Blockchain Association Policy Summit, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce emphasized the need for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to improve its regulation of the cryptocurrency industry. She criticized the SEC’s current approach, using the case against LBRY as an example. Peirce highlighted inconsistencies in the agency’s enforcement actions, questioning why certain firms were charged while others were not. She called the LBRY case a “low point” and criticized the arbitrary nature of the SEC’s enforcement actions in the crypto industry.
Peirce Advocates for Prioritizing “Real Harm” Cases
Peirce stressed the importance of prioritizing cases that cause “real harm” and suggested that the SEC streamline its process through rulemaking. This would conserve resources and provide clearer guidance to the industry, preventing firms from misinterpreting enforcement actions. Peirce believes that a more efficient approach to crypto regulation would involve both enforcement and the development of clear regulations, reducing the need for firms to guess the SEC’s intentions.
SEC Commissioners Differ on Crypto Regulation
Peirce’s comments come as Chair Gary Gensler leads the SEC in pursuing charges against major players in the crypto space. Gensler believes most cryptocurrencies qualify as securities and that firms must register with the agency. However, Peirce argues for a more balanced approach that combines enforcement with clear regulations. She also suggests involving Congress in defining regulatory authority over cryptocurrencies, contrasting with Gensler’s belief that existing frameworks are sufficient.
Hot Take: Striking a Balance between Enforcement and Regulation
Hester Peirce’s call for more effective regulation in the crypto industry highlights ongoing debates within the SEC. While Chair Gary Gensler has pursued aggressive enforcement actions, Peirce argues for a more balanced approach that combines enforcement with the development of clear regulations. By prioritizing cases that cause real harm and providing clearer guidance to the industry, Peirce believes the SEC can improve its regulatory efforts. The contrasting views between Peirce and Gensler underscore the challenges of regulating a rapidly evolving sector while protecting investors and promoting innovation.
By
By
By
By
By