SEC’s Battle Against Crypto Industry Reaches Critical Point
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is nearing a decisive moment in its legal battle with the crypto industry. During recent court hearings against Coinbase and Binance, SEC attorneys argued that many tokens on these platforms should be considered illegal securities offerings. However, federal judges seemed skeptical of the SEC’s arguments.
Defining Crypto Tokens as Securities
A major issue for the courts is how the SEC has defined crypto tokens under securities law. In the past, the agency targeted securities schemes rather than individual products. But recently, the SEC has alternated between deeming the sale of certain tokens illegal and labeling all cryptocurrencies as securities themselves.
SEC’s Inconsistent Position
The SEC’s inconsistent articulation of its position has raised concerns among legal experts. The agency seems uncertain about which interpretation of the law is correct and which one will benefit them the most. Both arguments pose significant liabilities for the SEC.
The Problem with Blanket Definitions
The argument that crypto tokens are securities regardless of context can lead to problems if a token’s issuing company fails or its team ceases to exist. Under a blanket definition, trading those tokens years later could still be considered involvement in an illegal scheme, even if no such scheme exists.
Struggling to Articulate Clear Theories
When the SEC argues that context matters in determining whether a crypto token is a security, it faces difficulties in providing an alternative theory. Judges have pushed back because they cannot understand what that theory is. The SEC has failed to articulate a clear position.
The Challenge of Drawing Clear Lines
Determining which cryptocurrencies are illegal securities offerings and which are not has been a persistent challenge for the SEC. Crypto companies have repeatedly asked for clarity, but their requests have been rejected. This has led industry leaders to perceive the SEC’s current leadership as hostile to a framework that would allow any cryptocurrency to thrive legally in the US.
No Explanation for Selective Approval
The approval of Bitcoin while disapproving of Ethereum has left the SEC without a clear explanation. It would be difficult for the agency to justify its stance because there is no substantive difference between the two cryptocurrencies. This inconsistency is now being scrutinized in well-funded legal battles against major players like Coinbase, Binance, and Ripple Labs.
Hot Take: The Future of Crypto Securities Regulation
The outcome of the SEC’s lawsuits against Coinbase, Binance, and Ripple Labs will have significant implications for the regulation of crypto securities. Once these cases reach the Court of Appeals, they will set binding precedents for other courts to follow. This will mark a crucial turning point in the battle between the SEC and the crypto industry.
By
By
By
By