Deaton’s Observation on SEC Hidden Agenda?
– John E. Deaton criticizes the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) approach to the crypto industry.
– He argues that the SEC’s focus on Section 5 cases and the secondary market on exchanges indicates misplaced priorities.
– Deaton condemns the SEC’s objection to individual investors serving as amici curiae in the Ripple case, suggesting a bias towards protecting financial institutions.
– He points out the SEC’s refusal to engage with Coinbase, a compliant platform, while meeting with the CEO of FTX, an exchange facing allegations of scamming users.
– Deaton believes the SEC’s inconsistent treatment of participants in the crypto market could hinder new businesses and favor established entities.
Future of Bitcoin and crypto, a free trade possible?
– Deaton acknowledges glitches in the SEC’s crypto regulations and highlights a double standard.
– He praises the idea behind Bitcoin, as it enables participation in free markets without intermediaries.
– These findings suggest that the SEC’s actions may be motivated by a desire to protect corporate capitalism.
– Concerns arise regarding the regulatory framework for digital assets and its potential for bias and inefficiency.
Hot Take
John E. Deaton’s critique of the SEC’s approach to the crypto industry sheds light on potential biases and misplaced priorities. His observations raise concerns about the regulatory framework for digital assets and its impact on new businesses. The SEC’s actions may be motivated by a desire to protect corporate capitalism, which could hinder innovation and growth in the crypto industry. However, Deaton still sees promise in Bitcoin and the idea of free markets without intermediaries. It is crucial to address the inconsistencies and biases within the regulatory system to ensure a fair and inclusive crypto ecosystem.
By
By
By
By
By